科学与信任危机 科学与信任危机
Toni G L A van der Meer1, Michael Hameleers1
1Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Current opinion in psychology
|November 12, 2025
概括
由于民粹主义言论和媒体动态,科学面临着信任危机. 维护科学合法性至关重要,以打击认识论的冷漠和普遍的怀疑.
科学领域:
- 科学社会学科学社会学
- 科学传播科学传播
- 公众对科学的信任
背景情况:
- 当代科学在一个机构信任下降和共识碎片化的气候中运作.
- 科学,虽然相对值得信赖,但面临着来自民粹主义叙事,两极分化的辩论和媒体消极性的挑战.
- 这些因素削弱了科学权威,并危及公众对知识的疏远.
研究的目的:
- 分析破坏公众对科学信任的多方面的挑战.
- 检查社会动态对科学知识的认知合法性的影响.
- 为了突出认识体系漠不关心的新兴威胁.
主要方法:
- 对影响科学的社会趋势进行定性分析.
- 在科学周围的公共话语中的修辞策略的审查.
- 对信任,怀疑和认识论权威的概念分析.
主要成果:
- 民粹主义言论和两极分化的辩论将科学家视为精英,加剧不信任.
- 科学信息越来越多地被视为纯粹的意见,挑战其认识论的权威.
- 媒体动态可以放大消极情绪,掩盖科学的建设性贡献.
结论:
- 信任的侵蚀威胁到科学的认识论权威,并有可能导致广泛的认识论冷漠.
- 需要采取紧急措施,在普遍的怀疑情绪中维护科学的合法性.
- 保持公众的信任对于科学的社会作用和影响至关重要.
更多相关视频
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
2.0K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.1K
相关概念视频
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
518
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
518
Social Traps
26.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.3K
Obedience
35.2K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.2K
Ethics in Research
25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
The Scientific Method
64.6K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.6K
The Scientific Method
255.5K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.5K
