相关实验视频
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.8K
披露集团成员身份减少了在虚构公共产品实地实验中的合作
1RWI-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, Hohenzollernstr. 1-3, 45128, Essen, Germany. christian.hoenow@rwi-essen.de.
Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)
|November 13, 2025
概括
在社会困境中揭露身份意外地减少了合作. 当小组成员保持匿名时,贡献率更高,特别是当参与者在社会上保持距离时.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 发展经济学 发展经济学
背景情况:
- 现实世界的社会困境在演员的可见性和行为上有所不同.
- 公开披露决策可以促进合作,但身份的具体影响尚不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 调查揭露群体成员身份是否会影响在社会困境中的合作.
- 检查先前存在的社会关系和群体组成的作用.
主要方法:
- 在纳米比亚农村的144个村民中进行了人工公共事业实地实验.
- 随机分配给两个条件:身份披露与未披露.
- 个人贡献仍然是私有的;只有小组成员的可见性不同.
主要成果:
- 当身份不被披露时,贡献率显著更高.
- 在确定条件下,当小组成员在社会上保持距离时,贡献率较低.
- 当身份被披露时,决策在群体内更为均,在群体之间更为异质.
结论:
- 匿名性,而不仅仅是决策的可见性,影响了在社会困境中的合作.
- 社会距离放大了身份披露对合作的负面影响.
- 集团动态和社会关系在合作成果中起着至关重要的作用.
更多相关视频
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.5K
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
14.4K
相关概念视频
Deindividuation
30.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.2K
Robbers Cave
14.7K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.7K
Groupthink
48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Social Loafing
38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.5K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.5K
In- and Out-Groups
42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K