通过明智的干预来增强好奇心,以改善政治对话和关系
Todd B Kashdan1, Patrick E McKnight2, Kerry Kelso2
1George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. todd@toddkashdan.com.
Scientific reports
|November 17, 2025
概括
通过培养好奇心来增强政治对话. 一项研究发现,认为群体成员是开放的心态增加了政治好奇心和动机从别人那里学习,即使跨越政治分歧.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 政治,意识形态和宗教差异往往会造成社会分裂.
- 有效的政治讨论受到防御和缺乏好奇心的阻碍.
研究的目的:
- 调查在政治对话中促进好奇心和减少防御性的因素.
- 识别政治好奇心的先例,并制定干预措施来增强它.
主要方法:
- 一个多项研究研究计划,研究政治好奇心和对话质量之间的关联.
- 识别被认为的群体内开放的心态和智力谦卑作为政治好奇心的先例.
- 开发和测试一种社会规范,将干预指向纠正对群体内特征的偏见.
主要成果:
- 政治好奇心与学习目标有积极的相关性,并减少了对立观点的社会距离.
- 个人倾向于低估他们自己的政党的开放性和智力谦逊.
- 通过纠正群体内偏见,干预成功地增加了政治好奇心和对以学习为导向的对话的动机.
结论:
- 对于培养政治好奇心来说,对群体内开放的看法至关重要.
- 一个简短的社会规范干预可以有效地增加好奇心和改善政治话语.
- 结果提供了减少防御和促进在两极分化环境中的建设性对话的见解.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.1K
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.6K
相关概念视频
Impression Management Techniques II: Ingratiation
136
Ingratiation refers to deliberate behaviors aimed at increasing one’s attractiveness or likability to a target person, often for strategic interpersonal or social gain. This set of impression management tactics is especially prevalent in hierarchical contexts, where influencing someone with greater power or authority can yield significant benefits. Several distinct ingratiation strategies have been identified, each leveraging psychological cues to foster favor and affiliation.Opinion...
136
Groupthink
48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Persuasion Strategies
42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K
Group Polarization
38.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.4K
Critical Thinking
988
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
988
Introspection
197
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
197
