一个随机对照试验,比较了电导和电液体体外冲击波石化的疗效,安全性和患者报告的结果
Hyeji Park1, Christine Joy Castillo2, Sung Yong Cho1,3
1Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Urologia
|November 20, 2025
概括
电导 (EC) 和电液 (EH) 石化术对脏和尿路结石的无结石率相似. EH ESWL在使用更少的能量和辐射的情况下提供了相似的疗效,尽管EC ESWL导致疼痛减少和患者满意度提高.
科学领域:
- 泌尿器科 泌尿器科 泌尿器科 泌尿器科
- 腎臟病學 (nephrology) 是一種醫學.
- 医疗技术 医疗技术 医学技术
背景情况:
- 身体外冲击波石 (ESWL) 是对脏和尿道结石的首要治疗方法.
- 电导 (EC) 和电液 (EH) 石是ESWL的两种方式.
- 对它们的疗效和患者报告结果的比较数据是有价值的.
研究的目的:
- 在一项随机对照试验中,比较EC和EH石的疗效,安全性和患者报告的结局.
- 为了评估无石头率,疼痛水平和患者满意度.
- 评估与每个模式相关的能源使用和辐射暴露.
主要方法:
- 一项随机对照试验,涉及56名尿道或结石患者.
- 患者被分配到EC或EH石三症组.
- 患者和石头特征的比较,无石头率,疼痛得分,满意度和辐射暴露.
主要成果:
- 在EC和EH组之间,无石头率没有显著差异.
- 通过EH石术,可以实现相似的无结石率,但使用的能量要少得多.
- 与EC组相比,EH组的疼痛分数较高 (p=0.063),但满意度和辐射暴露分数明显较低.
- 冲击的总数和石头位置被确定为无石头状态的重要预测因素.
结论:
- 无论是EC还是EH,都显示出可比的疗效和安全性,用于治疗脏和尿路结石.
- EH石术使用的能量更少,导致辐射暴露率更低.
- 虽然EC ESWL显示疼痛较低,满意度更高,但这些好处是以增加能量和辐射为代价的.
- 患者报告的结果,如满意度和疼痛,是评估ESWL模式的重要考虑因素.
相关概念视频
01:30Electroconvulsive Therapy
771
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or shock therapy, remains a critical biomedical intervention for severe, treatment-resistant depression. While its origins can be traced back to Hippocrates' observations that malaria-induced convulsions alleviated mental illness, modern ECT has evolved significantly from its earlier, more primitive applications. First introduced in 1938 by Ugo Cerletti and his colleagues, ECT involves inducing controlled seizures using electrical currents. In its early...
771
01:25Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
325
Procedures for Kidney StonesMedical intervention is necessary when kidney stones or renal calculi are too large to pass spontaneously (typically greater than 5 millimeters) when stones are accompanied by symptomatic infection (such as fever or pyelonephritis), when they impair kidney function, or when they cause persistent symptoms like severe pain, nausea, or urinary retention. Additionally, patients with only one kidney or those who cannot be treated with medical management also require...
325