Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

262
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
262
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

2.0K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
2.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Work Exposome estimation through Job Exposure Matrices - JEMs?

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

African American Food Environments and Anti-Inflammatory Intake in Pregnancy.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Trusted Sources: How Some US Employers Used Government Information During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

Striving for Sonographic Image Quality at the Expense of Personal Injury and Burnout.

Journal of diagnostic medical sonography : JDMS·2026
Same author

Cross-Sectional associations between inner setting determinants of self-efficacy and intent to deliver a healthy eating and activity curriculum embedded in a community setting.

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2025
Same author

The Multilevel Limb-loss and Preservation Rehabilitation Continuum model (MLPRC): An evidence-based implementation model integrating multiple perspectives to improve outcomes for people facing limb loss.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

885

评估工作场所减肥计划的实施,使用修改后的过程评估评分表.

Ryan J Walsh1, Jaime R Strickland2, Anna M Kinghorn3

  • 1Under Which Work Was Done: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Current Affiliation: Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
|November 24, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个经过修改的过程评估评分表 (PERS) 显示了与工作场所减肥计划成功相关的实施质量. 然而,随着时间的推移,这些好处逐渐减少,这凸显了持续评估的必要性.

关键词:
基于社区的参与式研究促进健康 促进健康肥胖管理 肥胖管理项目评估 项目评价总的工人健康®.

更多相关视频

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

885
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.1K

科学领域:

  • 职业健康 职业健康 职业健康
  • 行为科学 行为科学
  • 项目评估 项目评价

背景情况:

  • 职场健康计划对于员工健康至关重要.
  • 评估计划实施的质量对于了解有效性至关重要.
  • 过程评估评级表 (PERS) 是评估实施的一种工具.

研究的目的:

  • 评估修改后的PERS在评估工作场所减肥计划中的有效性.
  • 确定实施质量与计划有效性之间的关系.
  • 分析计划成果,包括组织健康和监督员支持.

主要方法:

  • 使用了斯皮尔曼相关性和等级回归.
  • 使用修改后的PERS.评估实施质量.
  • 通过多面组织健康气候评估 (MOHCA) 和职位内容问卷 (JCQ) 来衡量计划的有效性.

主要成果:

  • 11个工作组的407名工人参加了这次活动.
  • 较高的PERS分数与组织健康和监督支持的持续改善有关.
  • 在24个月的时间里,改善并没有持续下去.

结论:

  • 实施质量与工作场所健康计划的有效性有关.
  • 实施质量和有效性之间的关联随着时间的推移而消失.
  • 修改后的PERS可以改善对工作场所健康行为变化倡议的评估.