设计和实施一个试点反种族主义和结构能力评估研究生医学招生
Nientara Anderson1, J Corey Williams2, Allison Rooney3
1Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
概括
一个针对儿童和青少年精神病学奖学金的试点反种族主义和结构能力评估显示出了希望. 它提供了对申请人的见解.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 精神病学是一个精神病学.
- 健康 公平 卫生 公平
背景情况:
- 研究生医学教育 (GME) 招生中的整体审查旨在评估申请人超出传统指标.
- 整合与任务相关的评估可以通过评估与计划目标相关的能力来增强整体审查过程.
- 儿童和青少年精神病学 (CAP) 奖学金计划旨在招募该领域的多样化和有能力的未来领导者.
研究的目的:
- 设计,实施和评估一个试点反种族主义和结构性能力评估,用于一个CAP奖学金计划.
- 确定对试点评估的回应是否为整体审查录取提供了有价值的信息.
- 探索将新的,与任务相关的评估整合到GME补充应用中的可行性.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个试点评估,使用来自验证工具的利克特比例项和一个开放式构建的响应项.
- 项目被选中是为了使任务与农业政策计划目标保持一致,以及与卫生政策和教育相关性.
- 在2020-2021年CAP奖学金申请周期中对29名受访者进行了试点评估,并对回复进行了主题和定量分析.
主要成果:
- 申请人对健康项目的社会决定因素表示普遍同意,但对生物种族和反种族主义政策的反应不同.
- 对开放式响应的专题分析确定了六个关键主题:医疗保健获取差异,健康的社会决定因素,社会种族偏见和医疗不平等.
- 一个子集的反应表明潜在的负面种族态度或有限的参与,作为警告指标.
结论:
- 一个新的,与任务一致的评估可以为申请人提供一个平台,以证明与CAP奖学金目标相关的反种族主义能力.
- 对试点评估的回应产生了有意义的差异,这表明它对整体审查框架的潜在价值.
- 整合到补充申请中的项目特定评估是一个有前途的策略,可以加强整体审查并选择与任务相关的候选人.
相关概念视频
Halo Effect
376
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
376
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.8K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
343
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
343
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
1.6K
A thorough assessment of respiratory health is paramount in clinical settings to identify and manage respiratory distress and ensure adequate oxygenation. This article elaborates on the critical aspects of respiratory evaluation, including airway assessment, skin color examination, and the observation of accessory muscle use, which are integral to effectively diagnosing and managing patients with respiratory conditions.
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
1.6K
Confirmation Biases
7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K


