弥合公众对科学信任的差距:一个跨群体关系的视角
Olga Poluektova1, Federica Spaccatini1, Ilaria Giovannelli2
1University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
The British journal of social psychology
|November 26, 2025
概括
对科学的不信任源于群体间的动态,一些群体将科学家视为外部群体. 基于证据的策略,如协作和视角,可以重建公众对科学的信任.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 科学传播科学传播
- 公众对科学的信任
背景情况:
- 对科学的不信任是一个重大的社会问题.
- 集团间的动态为理解这种不信任提供了一个框架.
- 某些群体将科学家视为威胁的外部群体.
研究的目的:
- 通过跨群体动态的透视来分析对科学不信任的问题.
- 识别那些对科学家表现出不信任的特定群体.
- 提出基于证据的战略,以重建科学家与公众之间的信任.
主要方法:
- 审查跨组动力学理论.
- 对不信任的社会心理机制的分析 (例如,感知到的道德冲突,象征性威胁).
- 检查基于证据的干预措施.
主要成果:
- 不信任往往是由对科学家的看法驱动的,认为科学家是一个社会上遥远的外部群体.
- 具有保守倾向,高度社会支配倾向和科学民粹主义信仰的群体是关键.
- 策略包括结构化联系,重新分类和透视.
结论:
- 根据当地环境而定制,并以研究为指导的集团间方法可以重建信任.
- 成功的干预涉及参与性项目,突出共同的身份,并反映不同的道德观点.
- 这些方法应该补充更广泛的努力,以改善信息环境和社会条件.
相关概念视频
Impact of Groups on Groups
222
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
222
Robbers Cave
14.8K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.8K
Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Ethics in Research
25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
In- and Out-Groups
42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Stereotype Content Model
15.3K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.3K


