Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

1.8K
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
1.8K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.8K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.8K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

383
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
383

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Assessing qualitative individual differences with Bayesian hierarchical latent-mixture models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Random-effects psychophysics for studying individual differences in perception and cognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The role of reliability in experiments.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Estimating correlations in low-reliability settings with constrained hierarchical models.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Why many studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks may not localize correlations.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Does every study? Implementing ordinal constraint in meta-analysis.

Psychological methods·2021
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 4, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.8K

在个体差异中定位结构:视觉幻觉案例研究

Mahbod Mehrvarz1, Hrithik Popat2, Jeffrey N Rouder2

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. mehrvarm@uci.edu.

Attention, perception & psychophysics
|November 26, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

易受某种视觉错觉影响的人不一定易受其他视觉错觉影响. 虽然直接相关性很低,但一个共同的潜在因素影响了不同幻想的易感性.

关键词:
进行了因子分析.层次模型是层次模型.个人差异 个人差异可靠性 可靠性可靠性视觉错觉是一种幻觉.

更多相关视频

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.9K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

845

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.8K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.9K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

845

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 视觉感知 视觉感知 视觉感知
  • 心理物理学的精神物理.

背景情况:

  • 以前的研究表明,对不同视觉错觉的易感性存在微弱的相关性.
  • 这些低相关性反映真实关系与测量误差的程度尚不清楚.

研究的目的:

  • 研究不同视觉错觉的易感性之间的关系.
  • 评估测量误差对观察到的相关性的影响.
  • 为了确定潜在的共同因素背后的幻觉易感性.

主要方法:

  • 收集了来自149名参与者在使用调整范式的五种视觉错觉的两个变体上的数据.
  • 开发了新的数据可视化和层次模型来评估测量错误.
  • 采用贝叶斯的层次分析和潜变量分析.

主要成果:

  • 证明了低试验噪声和高可靠性 (≈0.93),具有强大的不同对象的可变性.
  • 在不同的幻觉易感性中观察到较低的相关性 (≈0.22 ± 0.07).
  • 潜变量分析发现了一个共同因素解释了23.3%的幻觉易感度差异,测量误差的减弱最小.

结论:

  • 对一种视觉错觉的敏感性并不能强烈预测对其他视觉错觉的敏感性.
  • 一个共同的潜伏因素有助于在各种幻觉中对敏感性的个体差异.
  • 测量误差最小地减轻了观察到的幻觉易感性之间的低相关性.