道德侵权和群体对个人的推断
1University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
概括
从群体数据中得出关于个人的结论,可能会面临道德批评. 这篇论文反对道德侵犯,建议传统的认识论框架更好地解释群对个体的推断.
科学领域:
- 认识论的认识论学.
- 伦理哲学 道德哲学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 基于群体证据对个人的推断是常见的.
- 这种推断往往会引起道德批评,因为它可能会低个人.
- 这就引起了认识论 (与知识相关) 和道德规范之间的冲突.
研究的目的:
- 检查群对个人推断的道德批评.
- 评估道德侵权论点,即认识标准基于道德关切而发生变化.
- 提出一个替代的框架来理解这些推断.
主要方法:
- 认识论的哲学分析认识论的理由.
- 检查团体对个人推理的道德维度.
- 对道德侵权论文的批评.
主要成果:
- 这篇论文提出了反对道德侵权论点的论点.
- 它表明,认识论的证明不应该受到潜在的道德错误的直接影响.
- 群体对个体的推断可以在认识论上是正确的,而不会引发道德侵犯.
结论:
- 道德侵权是对围绕群体对个体推断问题的不充分解释.
- 传统的框架,专注于基于证据的认识论证明,提供了一个更强大的理解.
- 在这样的推断中调和认识论和道德考虑,需要仔细区分理由和其他规范因素.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.1K
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.5K
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Deindividuation
30.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.2K
Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Conformity
47.8K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.8K
Motivational Bias
298
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
298
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
