Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Non-equilibrium in the Cell01:16

Non-equilibrium in the Cell

5.3K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
5.3K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

5.5K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
5.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.6K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

255.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.3K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Evaluating generative AI's potential to dispel misinformation about wind farms.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Meta-analyses on charitable giving clarify evidence for empathic and effective altruism.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Thiol-Methylsulfone Crosslinked Hydrogels for Cell Encapsulation: Molecular Scale Modulation of Physiochemical Properties.

Macromolecular bioscience·2026
Same author

Navigating the credibility risks of environmental scientists' activism.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Youth, personality and collective victimhood distinguish support for radical climate action.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Social Norms and Charitable Giving: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same journal

Visual liking as sensory valuation.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Visual preferences across species: A comparative framework.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Collective memory and historical thinking in times of uncertainty.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Does behavioral parent training benefit from cultural adaptations? A critical analysis.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Politics in psychiatry and psychotherapis in Japan with personal reflection; Is cognitive behavior therapy non-political?

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Antisemitism in professional clinical psychology training.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

使用对话式人工智能来减少对科学的怀疑.

Matthew J Hornsey1, Aimee E Smith1, Samuel Pearson1

  • 1The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

Current opinion in psychology
|November 27, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

大型语言模型 (LLM) 在打击科学错误信息方面表现有前途. 研究表明,与LLM的对话通常会减少怀疑和对错误信息的认可,帮助科学传播.

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

科学领域:

  • 科学传播是科学传播.
  • 人工智能的人工智能
  • 公众对科学的信任.

背景情况:

  • 在气候变化和疫苗接种等关键问题上对科学共识的广泛不信任阻碍了全球威胁应对.
  • 包括大型语言模型 (LLM) 在内的生成人工智能存在大规模传播错误信息的风险.
  • 此外,LLM还为减少错误信息和阴谋论提供了机会,有可能改变科学传播.

研究的目的:

  • 审查使用对话式人工智能 (如ChatGPT) 的实证研究,以解决对科学的不信任.
  • 评估LLMs在消除有关有争议的科学话题的怀疑主义方面的潜力.

主要方法:

  • 总结当前关于对话式人工智能和科学交流的实证研究格局.
  • 分析研究的分析,调查用户和LLMs在科学主题上的互动.

主要成果:

  • 经验研究显示,对LLM复制阴谋论或错误信息的证据微不足道.
  • 与LLM的对话通常会减少参与者的科学怀疑和对错误信息的信念.
  • 士互动往往会促进对科学共识的更大信任.

结论:

  • 目前的LLM显示出作为一种提高科学传播策略的工具的潜力.
  • 保护措施是必要的,以保持信息完整性和公众的信任,当使用LLMs.
  • 在努力重建公众对科学的信任方面,LLM可以成为一个有价值的补充.