在网上讨论中集体调节仇恨,毒性和极端主义
Jana Lasser1,2, Alina Herderich1,3, Joshua Garland4,5
1IDea_Lab, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
PNAS nexus
|December 1, 2025
概括
有效应对网上仇恨言论包括表达直截了当的意见,即使不是事实,但没有侮辱. 这种由公民领导的策略,称为反言论,减少了社交媒体平台上的仇恨,毒性和极端主义.
科学领域:
- 数字通信 数字通信
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 在线话语分析在线话语分析
背景情况:
- 仇恨言论威胁着在线公共话语,因言论自由冲突和可扩展性问题而存在适度挑战.
- 反对言论,一种由公民主导的适度形式,提出了减轻在线仇恨的潜在解决方案.
- 现有的研究往往依赖于有限的样本和一次性分析,需要对反演讲有效性的更广泛的调查.
研究的目的:
- 调查各种反言论策略在减少在线平台上的仇恨言论,毒性和极端主义方面的有效性.
- 分析在不同级别的在线互动中反语音的有效性:个别的tweet对 (微层),整个讨论 (mesolevel) 和时间趋势 (宏观层).
- 确定适用于广泛公民参与的可操作的反言论策略.
主要方法:
- 从2015年到四年间,分析了超过13万个德国Twitter讨论.
- 使用人类注释和机器学习分类器来识别论证策略,内组/外组引用,情绪基调和话语质量.
- 采用匹配和时间序列分析来评估自然发生的反语音策略的影响.
主要成果:
- 在所有分析层面上,表达直截了当的意见,没有侮辱,被发现是减少随后的仇恨,毒性和极端主义的最有效策略.
- 刺也证明了提高话语质量的有效性,特别是在有组织的极端主义团体的背景下.
- 调查结果表明,简单的,非侮辱性的意见是公民的实用和有效的反言论方法.
结论:
- 公民主导的反言论,特别是通过直截了当的,非侮辱性的意见,可以显著减轻在线仇恨言论,提高话语质量.
- 该研究提供了基于证据的建议,通过集体公民调节来管理在线公共空间.
- 结果为个人提供了可扩展和可访问的方法,以促进更健康的在线环境.
关键词:
心理学和认知科学 心理学和认知科学社会科学 社会科学 社会科学社会与政治科学 > 政治科学集体调节集体调节反对演讲反演讲的演讲情绪 情绪 情绪 情绪 情绪外群思维是一种外群思维.政治讨论政治讨论更多相关视频
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.5K
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.5K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
38.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.3K
Self-Help Support Groups
288
Self-help support groups are voluntary, community-based organizations that provide a platform for individuals with shared concerns to exchange support, insights, and practical strategies for coping with life challenges. Typically led by group members or paraprofessionals, these groups form a cornerstone of mental health care, especially in reaching populations that are underserved by traditional healthcare systems.
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
288
Groupthink
48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Bullying
8.8K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.8K
Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps
1.3K
The gene expression in cells is regulated at different stages: (i) transcription, (ii) RNA processing, (iii) RNA localization, and (iv) translation. Transcriptional regulation is mediated by regulatory proteins such as transcription factors, activators, or repressors—these control gene expression by initiating or inhibiting the transcription of genes. Once a precursor or pre-mRNA is produced, it undergoes post-transcriptional modification, including 5' capping, splicing, and the...
1.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.5K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.5K
