在公共卫生中应用批判性思维框架:对加强决策和政策制定的战略方法的系统审查
Hussien Saber Hussein1, Kaveh Bahmanpour2, Mohammad Fathi2
1Department of Health care management, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Technologies Islamic Azad University, Research and Sciences branch Tehran Iran.
Health science reports
|December 1, 2025
概括
结构化的批判性思维框架改善了公共卫生决策和政策制定. 应用诸如苏格拉底式质疑和根源原因分析之类的框架可以增强基于证据的策略和规划,以获得更好的健康结果.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 卫生政策 卫生政策
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
背景情况:
- 批判性思维对于有效的公共卫生决策,干预评估和政策制定至关重要.
- 结构化的批判性思维框架提供了系统的方法来应对复杂的公共卫生挑战.
- 本次审查评估了这些框架在公共卫生中的应用和有效性.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和评估结构化批判性思维框架在公共卫生中的应用.
- 突出这些框架在改善基于证据的决策方面的有效性.
- 评估它们在政策制定和实施中的作用.
主要方法:
- 根据PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统审查.
- 在PubMed,Scopus,科学网和谷歌学者 (1990-2024) 上进行了搜索.
- 在公共卫生环境中分析了五种特定的批判性思维框架 (苏格拉底式质疑,根源原因分析,德尔菲方法,情景规划,保罗-埃尔德).
主要成果:
- 综合包括了86项研究.
- 确定了五个框架:苏格拉底式质疑 (对话,参与),保罗-埃尔德 (推理,分析),情景规划 (适应性政策),根本原因分析 (干预) 和德尔菲方法 (共识).
- 这些框架共同增强了公共卫生中的推理,包容性和战略规划.
结论:
- 结构化的批判性思维框架显著加强了公共卫生决策和政策制定.
- 融入公共卫生系统和培训可以提高政策的适应性,公平性和有效性.
- 需要进一步研究不同环境中的长期影响.
相关概念视频
Critical Thinking I
4.5K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
4.5K
Critical Thinking II
4.0K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
4.0K
Patient-centered Care
2.8K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.8K
Critical Thinking
986
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
986
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
470
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
470
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
342
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
342


