Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

538
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
538
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

555
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
555
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

875
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
875
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

630
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
630
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Development and validation of a multimodal artificial intelligence-based model for predicting post-prostatectomy treatment outcomes from baseline biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)·2026
Same author

The impact of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a qualitative study.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Economic Evaluation of Oral Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for COVID-19 in Higher Risk Outpatients.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Mitigating algorithmic unfairness arising from forgetfulness of medical records in clinical artificial intelligence.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Development and Validation of a Multimodal AI-Based Model for Predicting Post-Prostatectomy Treatment Outcomes from Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus usual care in at-risk adults with early SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK, 2022-23: virological and immunological results of an open-label randomised trial (PANORAMIC).

The Lancet. Microbe·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

在人口队列数据中导航严重的阶级不平衡

Joshua Fieggen, Bradley Segal, Emma C Walker

    Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
    |December 3, 2025
    PubMed
    概括

    用不平衡的数据预测像多发性骨髓瘤这样的罕见疾病是具有挑战性的. 异常检测模型的性能优于传统方法,但没有一种方法是普遍最佳的;临床应用指导模型选择.

    科学领域:

    • 机器学习 机器学习
    • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
    • 基因组学就是基因组学.

    背景情况:

    • 阶级不平衡在大型人群研究中对罕见疾病结果的预测建模提出了重大挑战.
    • 传统的机器学习算法通常在不平衡的数据集上表现出偏差的性能和糟糕的概括性.

    研究的目的:

    • 利用蛋白质学和临床数据系统地评估各种方法,以缓解预测多发性骨髓瘤的类失衡.
    • 为了比较标准分类器,重新采样技术,异常检测,以及用于罕见疾病预测的基础模型.

    主要方法:

    • 比较了XGBoost,物流回归,SMOTE,隔离森林,局部异常因素,一类SVM,自动编码器和TabPFN.
    • 引入了一个顺序的XGBoost组合 (SeqXGB) 以优先考虑精度.
    • 在英国生物库数据上使用标准分类性能指标评估模型.

    主要成果:

    • 与传统分类器 (XGBoost,物流回归) 相比,异常检测模型显示出更高的概括性.
    • SMOTE没有改善,甚至可能恶化预测性能.
    • SeqXGB显著降低了假阳性,但也显著降低了灵敏度.

    结论:

    更多相关视频

    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
    04:57

    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

    Published on: October 23, 2020

    10.7K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.5K

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    15.0K
    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
    04:57

    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

    Published on: October 23, 2020

    10.7K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.5K
  • 没有一种单一的方法可以普遍解决类不平衡问题;模型选择必须与临床应用以及虚假阳性和阴性之间的权衡保持一致.
  • 研究结果强调,在评估罕见疾病的机器学习模型时,需要考虑具体的临床目的 (例如,查与诊断).