图书馆员和信息专家对系统评审进行方法论同行评审的观点:一种混合方法的研究研究
Melissa L Rethlefsen1, Carrie Price2, Sara Schroter3
1University of New Mexico Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA mlrethlefsen@gmail.com.
图书馆员和信息专家 (LIS) 为同行评审提供了有价值的方法专业知识. 当他们的专业知识受到重视和重视时,聘请LIS作为同行评审者可能会受到好评,从而提高SR质量.
科学领域:
- 医学图书馆 医学图书馆员
- 信息科学 信息科学 信息科学
- 系统审查方法论 系统审查方法论
背景情况:
- 图书馆员和信息专家 (LIS) 拥有对系统审查 (SRs) 有价值的方法专业知识.
- 作为SR的同行评审者,LIS的作用和影响仍未得到充分研究.
- 了解LIS同行评审的促进者和障碍,对于提高SR质量至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 探索LIS对其作为SRs的同行评审者的经验和影响的观点.
- 确定影响LIS参与SRs方法论同行评审的促进者和障碍.
主要方法:
- 对LIS进行了一项调查,这些LIS在BMJ期刊上的同行评审SR进行了调查.
- 专注小组与调查受访者的一个子集进行了调查,以更深入地探讨促进者和障碍.
- 收集了关于LIS经验,审查期间重点领域,感知影响和愿意再次审查的数据.
主要成果:
- 大多数受访者都是经验丰富的LIS,他们专注于搜索和SR方法.
- 大多数LIS认为他们的评论影响了编辑决策和作者修订.
- 同行评审的主要障碍包括时间限制和恐吓;动机包括职业责任和提高SR质量.
结论:
- 在SRs的方法学同行评审中,LIS代表了一个未充分利用的资源.
- 评价和考虑LIS专业知识可以提高SR质量和编辑决策.
- 鼓励创造性努力,以促进LIS作为方法学同行评审者.
更多相关视频
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
相关概念视频
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Ethics in Research
