相关实验视频
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

09:11
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
22.2K
在前列腺癌成像中,ADC和ADC比率在格里森得分7的区别中进行了ADC和ADC比较评估
D Samaras1, G Agrotis2, D Tsivaka1
1Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.
European journal of radiology open
|December 4, 2025
概括
表面扩散系数比率 (ADCratio) 有效地区分前列腺癌格里森得分7个子组在3.0T的MRI. 这种成像生物标志物显示出可靠的癌症分级的前景.
科学领域:
- 放射学 放射学是一门学科.
- 在瘤学瘤学.
- 医疗成像医学成像
背景情况:
- 多参数MRI (mpMRI) 与扩散权重成像 (DWI) 对于前列腺癌 (PCa) 检测和分级至关重要.
- 显微扩散系数 (ADC) 有助于组织特征,可能区分格里森得分7 (GS 7) 子组 (GS 3+4 vs. GS 4+3).
研究的目的:
- 在区分GS 7PCa子组时评估平均ADC和ADC比率.
- 评估磁场强度 (1.5T与3.0T) 对这些指标诊断性能的影响.
主要方法:
- 在48名GS 7 PCa患者的回顾性分析中,他们接受了1.5T或3.0T的mpMRI.
- 独立放射科医生对瘤和正常感兴趣区域 (ROI) 的划定.
- 统计分析包括观察者间协议 (ICC),相关性,t测试和ROC分析.
主要成果:
- 对于平均ADC和ADC比率 (ICC > 0.9) 的观测者间非常好的协议.
- 在3.0T时,平均ADC和ADC比均显著差异化GS 3+4与GS 4+3 (p <0.05).
- 在1.5T时没有观察到任何显著的差异;然而,在组合数据集中,ADC比率显示出更好的性能 (AUC 0.748) 比平均ADC (AUC 0.718).
结论:
- 在不同的磁场强度中,ADC比率显示出高可重现性和稳定的诊断性能.
- ADC比率显示出作为前列腺癌分级的可靠成像生物标志物的潜力,特别是在3.0T的MRI.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Radiological investigations are paramount in the diagnosis and management of various pulmonary diseases. Two essential investigations are the Pulmonary Angiogram and the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...

