日本Perme ICU流动性评分的可靠性和有效性:初步心理测量评估
Sho Katayama1,2, Tomohiro Ikeda1, Nobuto Nakanishi3
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Progress in rehabilitation medicine
|December 4, 2025
概括
日本的Perme ICU流动性评分是评估在日本重症监护室 (ICU) 退院后患者流动性和功能状态的可靠和有效工具.
科学领域:
- 康复医学 康复医学 康复医学
- 关键护理医学 关键护理医学
- 健康科学 卫生科学 卫生科学
背景情况:
- 珀姆重症监护室 (ICU) 移动性评分是评估重症监护室 (ICU) 患者功能状态的重要工具.
- 缺乏经过验证的日本版本的珀姆分数,这阻碍了其在日本的使用.
研究的目的:
- 为了将Perme ICU 流动性评分翻译成日语.
- 评估日本ICU中使用的日本版Perme评分的可靠性和有效性.
主要方法:
- 进行了前向后向翻译,以创建日本Perm Score.
- 评估者之间的可靠性是使用加权的卡帕系数来评估的.
- 构造有效性通过与MRC-SS,FSS-ICU和IMS相关的得分来评估.
- 用ROC分析分析了日常生活活动 (ADL) 独立性和排放目的地的预测有效性.
主要成果:
- 日本的珀姆评分显示出高的评级者之间的可靠性 (κ=0.83).
- 与FSS-ICU (rho=0.61) 和IMS (rho=0.73) 发现了中度的相关性.
- 对ADL独立性和家庭出院的预测有效性显示AUC分别为0.76和0.73.
- 在10%的患者中观察到天花板效应;没有检测到地板效应.
结论:
- 日本Perm Score是一个可靠和有效的仪器,用于评估ICU出院时患者的身体功能.
- 这种经过验证的工具可以帮助评估患者的康复和计划在日本的ICU后护理.
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
740
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
740
Nursing Evaluation
4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K


