两个短暂的酒精干预措施的变化机制:测试理论调解者对反态度倡导和个性化反干预效应的测试
Angelo M DiBello1, Clayton Neighbors2, Melissa R Hatch1
1Center for Alcohol and Substance Use Studies & Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
针对大量饮酒的大学生,个性化规范反 (PNF) 和反态度倡导 (CAA) 干预措施通过不同的机制工作. PNF降低了感知规范,而CAA降低了不和,这两者都导致酒精消耗减少和后果减少.
科学领域:
- 行为科学是一种行为科学.
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 确定作用机制对于开发有效的酒精干预措施至关重要.
- 这项研究考察了两个短暂的酒精干预的基于理论的机制.
研究的目的:
- 测试基于理论的变化机制,用于反态度倡导 (CAA) 和个性化规范反 (PNF) 的干预.
- 了解这些干预措施如何影响大学生饮酒和相关后果.
主要方法:
- 一项有效性试验的二次分析,该试验涉及585名沉醉饮酒的大学生.
- 将CAA,PNF和一个仅进行评估的对照组进行比较.
- 利用多层次调解分析,检查被认为的规范,不和,态度和保护性行为策略作为调解者.
主要成果:
- PNF降低了感知规范,导致酒精消费减少,后果更少.
- CAA减少了不和,也与减少饮酒和后果有关.
- PNF意外增加了不和,与更大的酒精消费和后果相关.
结论:
- PNF和CAA干预通过不同的底层机制运作.
- 实证地确定干预过程对于理解和改进酒精干预至关重要.
更多相关视频
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
07:31Murine Drinking Models in the Development of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Drinking in the Dark and Two-bottle Choice
Published on: January 7, 2019
相关概念视频
Routes of Persuasion
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Persuasion Strategies
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
Impact of Individuals on Individuals
