暴力极端主义相互升级:来自丹麦的实验和纵向证据
Milan Obaidi1, Robin Bergh2, John F Dovidio3
1Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
PNAS nexus
|December 5, 2025
概括
敌意的感知助长了群体间的冲突,导致相互暴力的意图. 这项研究表明,多数和少数群体如何通过心理机制随着时间的推移而升级相互敌意.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 冲突研究 冲突研究
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 在全球范围内,跨群体冲突正在跨越各种社会分裂而上升.
- 升级的敌意往往是由对威胁的相互看法和心理机制驱动的.
- 关于相互升级的群体间暴力的心理动态存在有限的研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查导致多数和少数群体之间相互暴力意图的心理机制.
- 为不断升级的群体间冲突动态提供新的因果洞察力.
- 在跨群体环境中,随着时间的推移,证明相互的暴力意图.
主要方法:
- 实验和纵向研究设计的整合.
- 利用一个以丹麦群体间紧张局势为重点的案例研究.
- 在两个波段进行了实验,以评估暴力意图的变化.
主要成果:
- 对外群体的敌意预测了对该群体暴力极端主义的支持增加.
- 发现了相互动态的证据,在各个群体之间,敌意同时升级.
- 这项研究是首次证明大多数和少数群体之间的相互暴力意图随着时间的推移.
结论:
- 对威胁和敌意的相互认知是不断升级的群体间冲突的关键驱动因素.
- 心理机制对群体间暴力的循环有着显著的贡献.
- 了解这些动态对于缓解广泛的群体间敌意至关重要.
更多相关视频
07:04Site-Directed Mutagenesis for In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments Exemplified with RNA Interactions in Escherichia Coli
Published on: February 5, 2019
20.5K
09:33Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: November 15, 2024
1.9K
相关概念视频
The Scientific Method
57.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Longitudinal Research
11.7K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.7K
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Relationship Formation
28.5K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
28.5K
Robbers Cave
13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K
Group Polarization
31.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
31.3K
