通过/失败与本科医学教育的分层成绩和学术表现:交叉研究
Boris Modrau1,2, Karina Frahm Kirk1, Sinan Mouaayad Abdulaimma Said1
1Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9940, Denmark.
JMIR medical education
|December 8, 2025
概括
通过/失败考试的失败率高于分级分级,但没有影响最终的成绩. 这表明通过/失败评分的重点是维持医学学生的最低标准.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 评估方法 评估方法
- 学生表现评估 学生表现评估
背景情况:
- 关于通过/失败与医学教育中的分级分级存在争论.
- 越来越多的人采用通过/失败评估,这引发了对学生成绩的担忧.
- 阿尔堡大学2018年课程改革为研究评估变化提供了机会.
研究的目的:
- 根据考试分级原则评估医学学生的学术表现.
- 为了比较通过/失败和分级分级系统之间的结果.
主要方法:
- 阿尔堡大学医学院的一项单中心队列研究.
- 对第四年和第五年临床模块 (2015年秋季-2023年春季) 从分级到通过/失败以及反过来进行了检查.
- 主要结果:最终执照考试成绩和前两年的考试失败率.
主要成果:
- 通过/失败考试的失败率较高 (3.3%),与分级级别考试 (1.97%) 相比.
- 当接近失败的分层成绩被计算为失败时,这种差异减少了.
- 最终许可证考试成绩没有受到分级系统变化的影响.
结论:
- 通过/失败考试导致失败率更高,但没有降低整体学业成绩.
- 研究结果表明,通过/失败评分可能优先考虑确保最低能力,而不是奖励高成绩.
相关概念视频
Crossover Experiments
4.5K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.5K
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
538
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
538
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
164
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
164
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
141
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
141
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
465
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
465


