Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.8K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.8K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

221
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
221
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

38.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.3K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

30.1K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
30.1K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Intentions poorly explain how and why people engage in offensive and defensive forms of violence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Group-mindedness as evolved solution to deal with group-living.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

The hidden costs of human cooperation.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Blind spots: The (social) factors of willful ignorance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Reciprocity evolves more readily in competitive than cooperative socio-ecologies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Why do people oppose new rules? Policy change, norm change, and public outrage.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K

辩护言论如何升级集团间冲突

Luuk L Snijder1, Jörg Gross2, Carsten K W De Dreu1,3,4

  • 1Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

iScience
|December 9, 2025
PubMed
概括

冲突领导人经常对他们的真实意图撒谎,利用自卫的说法来集结支持. 这种欺骗性的言论,被人们和人工智能所相信,加剧了冲突,使领导者受益于社会的代价.

关键词:
决策科学科学 决策科学政治科学是政治学中的一个领域.研究方法研究方法社会科学社会科学社会科学 社会科学 社会科学社会学 社会学 社会学

更多相关视频

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.9K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.9K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.4K

科学领域:

  • 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
  • 计算社会科学 计算社会科学

背景情况:

  • 在冲突情况下,真相往往会被妥协.
  • 领导人的战略沟通在冲突升级中起着至关重要的作用.

研究的目的:

  • 分析冲突中的领导人对意图的战略歪曲.
  • 调查自卫言论在动员支持和升级冲突中的作用.

主要方法:

  • 分析了来自现实世界冲突的261份宣言.
  • 使用人类参与者的实验研究 (n=252,312).
  • 使用大型语言模型进行测试 (2,162个重复样本).

主要成果:

  • 攻击方的领导人经常用自卫的说法掩盖剥削目标.
  • 真实和虚假的自卫言论都容易被人类和人工智能所相信.
  • 自卫要求增加追随者支持和昂贵的贡献,即使对非威胁性团体.

结论:

  • 领导人的欺骗性信号,特别是自卫言论,是冲突升级的关键驱动力.
  • 这种策略通过增加冲突强度和社会成本,使领导者受益.
  • 了解这种动态对于缓解浪费性集团间冲突至关重要.