不对称性是新的完美吗? 用人工智能重新定义美丽
Eqram Rahman1, Parinitha Rao2, Karim Sayed3
1Research and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK. Eqram.rahman@gmail.com.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
|December 9, 2025
概括
脸部不对称性越来越被认为是美丽的,特别是年轻和多元化的群体,挑战传统的美容标准. 这种转变反映了不断变化的社会观念和个性的吸引力.
科学领域:
- 审美学和感知学
- 计算机视觉 计算机视觉
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 从历史上看,面部对称一直是美丽和吸引力的首要标准.
- 不断变化的社会规范表明,人们越来越重视面部不对称性作为独特的美学特征.
- 这项研究调查了面部不对称性在不同的人口统计学中的当代美容观念中的作用.
研究的目的:
- 挑战面部对称性作为美丽的唯一决定因素的传统观点.
- 探索面部不对称性可能在美丽感知中发挥的积极作用.
- 检查文化规范,社交媒体和代际转变对这些观念的影响.
主要方法:
- 利用了由200名参与者评价的10,000张面部图像 (真实和合成) 的数据集.
- 使用机器学习 (Dlib,OpenCV,CNNs) 来量化面部不对称性和预测吸引力.
- 纳入社会文化变量,包括文化规范,社交媒体的影响和代际数据.
主要成果:
- 在面部不对称性和吸引力之间发现了中度的负相关性 (-0.31),线不对称性更为敏感.
- 年轻一代,LGBTQIA+个人和东亚受访者对不对称的看法更为中立或积极.
- 卷积神经网络 (CNN) 模型解释了68%的吸引力差异,突出了社会文化影响.
结论:
- 美丽标准正在转变,不对称性越来越受欢迎,特别是在年轻和多样化的群体中.
- 吸引力越来越被个性定义,超越了完美的对称的传统理想.
- 社会文化因素显著影响美丽中面部不对称的感知和接受.
相关概念视频
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
203
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
203
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
5.3K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
5.3K
Relationship Formation
45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Symmetry
153
The equation of an ellipse centered at the origin defines all points whose distances from the center maintain a constant ratio between the horizontal and vertical axes. This equation results in a smooth, closed curve that extends further along the x-axis than the y-axis, giving it a horizontal orientation. Such an ellipse demonstrates three kinds of symmetry: across the x-axis, across the y-axis, and about the origin. These symmetries are essential in understanding the graph's structure and...
153
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
541
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
541
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
55.3K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
55.3K


