Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Data Collection I01:30

Data Collection I

7.7K
Data collection gathers information needed to make accurate judgments about a patient's present condition. During a health history interview, subjective data is collected from the patient, their caregivers, or family members, and objective data is collected through observations and physical assessment. Patients are the primary source of subjective data. Thus information gathered from patients through interviews, observations, and physical examination is primary data. Secondary sources of...
7.7K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.3K
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.5K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Neural Networks or Linguistic Features? - Comparing Different Machine-Learning Approaches for Automated Assessment of Text Quality Traits Among L1- and L2-Learners' Argumentative Essays.

International journal of artificial intelligence in education·2025
Same author

Who am I? A second-order meta-analytic review of correlates of the self in childhood and adolescence.

Psychological bulletin·2024
Same author

A closer look at the domain-specific associations of openness with language achievement: Evidence on the role of intrinsic value from two large-scale longitudinal studies.

The British journal of educational psychology·2022
Same author

New wine in an old bottle? A facet-level perspective on the added value of Grit over BFI-2 Conscientiousness.

PloS one·2020

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K

用生成性人工智能提取数据:使用从系统审查数据库中提取的人类数据来评估准确性的决定因素.

Thorben Jansen1, Lucas W Liebenow1, Ute Mertens1

  • 1Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel University.

Psychological bulletin
|December 15, 2025
PubMed
概括

生成型人工智能 (genAI) 在系统性审查中显示出加速心理数据提取的潜力,但准确性因变量而异,需要人类的仔细监督.

更多相关视频

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.4K

科学领域:

  • 心理学科学 心理学科学
  • 研究中的人工智能.

背景情况:

  • 心理学的系统文献评论依赖于准确的数据提取以获得可靠性.
  • 目前的数据提取方法耗时,阻碍了研究效率.
  • 生成型人工智能 (genAI),特别是大型语言模型 (LLM),在医学数据提取方面表现有前途.

研究的目的:

  • 系统地评估genAI的准确性和错误模式,用于在各种心理领域提取数据.
  • 在心理系统性审查中,将genAI提取的数据与人类提取的数据进行比较.
  • 在心理学研究中确定影响genAI提取精度的因素.

主要方法:

  • 将genAI提取的数据与22个系统审查数据库中的2,179项研究的人类提取数据进行了比较.
  • 用八种不同的大型语言模型 (LLM) 来进行数据提取.
  • 分析了 186 个变量的提取精度和错误模式.

主要成果:

  • 对于20%的变量,LLM提取精度是不可接受的,对于15%的变量,准确度是可以接受的,但不高.
  • 准确性最多取决于变量,其次是系统性审查,最少取决于LLM.
  • 与效果大小变量相比,在上下文/主管变量中观察到更高的准确性.
  • 提取精度与变量描述细节和LLM大小正相关.

结论:

  • 在心理学系统性审查中,GenAI显示了加速数据提取的潜力,但目前的准确性是可变的.
  • 准确性受到变量的类型,描述中的细节和LLM功能的影响.
  • 需要进一步的研究,以优化基因AI的使用,同时保持可靠的心理研究的人类控制.