Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.6K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.0K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.0K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.3K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.3K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Structural Cardiac Abnormalities, Ventricular Dysfunction Phenotypes, and Heart Failure Risk among Antiretroviral Therapy-treated People Living with HIV in South Africa.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Associations of urinary incontinence, absorbent product use, and confidence gained from absorbent product use with perceived ageism in later adulthood.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Long-Term Glycemic Control and Pharmacotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Descriptive Analysis of 10-Year Trends in a Statewide Sample.

Journal of diabetes research·2026
Same author

Mortality Following Atypical Femoral Fractures in Men.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2026
Same author

A framework for causal estimand selection under positivity violations.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

对小子集团的反事实公平性.

Solvejg Wastvedt1, Jared D Huling1, Julian Wolfson1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota,  2221 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|December 15, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

新的方法改善了风险预测模型的公平性评估,特别是对于小,边缘化的群体. 这种方法通过解决算法公平性的数据局限性和统计挑战来增强临床决策.

关键词:
算法的公平性算法的公平性.有关因果推理的推理.风险预测风险预测小小的子组小小的子组.

更多相关视频

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

科学领域:

  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 机器学习伦理学 机器学习伦理学

背景情况:

  • 风险预测模型的现有公平度指标与小的,边缘化的子组作斗争.
  • 临床应用需要公平性评估,以考虑治疗混.
  • 样本大小的限制阻碍了对弱势群体的歧视的补救.

研究的目的:

  • 开发用于小子组风险预测模型中评估和纠正差异性表现的新方法.
  • 解决风险预测模型在临床应用中的统计挑战.
  • 增强医疗保健中边缘化群体的算法公平性.

主要方法:

  • 提出了新的估计方法,利用跨多个群体的信息.
  • 使用比传统技术更大的数据量估计的公平量.
  • 引入了一种新的数据借用方法,使用外部数据缺乏结果.

主要成果:

  • 开发的方法允许在较小的子组中进行公平性评估.
  • 该方法有效地纳入外部数据以改善估计.
  • 在COVID-19大流行期间使用的真实世界的风险预测模型上展示了应用.

结论:

  • 拟议的三步方法提高了在临床风险预测中实现算法公平性的能力.
  • 这种方法解决了现有技术的关键局限性,特别是针对弱势群体.
  • 这些发现对公平的医疗保健提供和治疗指导有重大影响.