在青少年中不一致的酒精使用报告:对调查有效性的影响
1Centre for Childhood and Youth Research, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|December 18, 2025
概括
近19%的青少年不一致地报告了酒精使用 (AU) 和醉酒经验 (IE),这可能会影响研究. 解决这种不一致性对于准确的青少年物质使用研究至关重要.
科学领域:
- 青少年健康 青少年健康
- 药物使用研究研究 药物使用研究
- 数据的有效性数据的有效性
背景情况:
- 关于青少年饮酒的横截面研究往往忽视了报告不一致性的情况.
- 不一致的报道可以在研究结果中引入偏见.
- 准确的青少年酒精使用 (AU) 和醉酒经验 (IE) 的数据至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 估计青少年中AU和IE不一致报告者的患病率.
- 识别与不一致报告相关的因素.
- 检查排除不一致的记者对AU/IE流行率和生活满意度协会的影响.
主要方法:
- 分析了来自42,772名青少年 (年龄11-18岁) 在五次四年一次的调查 (2006-2022) 中的数据.
- 通过自我报告的AU和IE的逻辑矛盾来识别不一致的报道者.
- 在排除不一致报告者之前和之后的流行率估计和统计关联的比较.
主要成果:
- 大约19%的青少年被确定为不一致的报道者,年比年有显著的变化 (2022年为2.6%,2014年为31.4%).
- 性别和学校类型与不一致的报告有关,尽管效果大小小.
- 排除不一致的报道者主要影响了禁酒者,不经常使用者和最低程度的IE患者的患病率估计,并改变了17.5%的生活满意度关联意义.
结论:
- 不一致的报道大大损害了青少年饮酒研究的有效性.
- 为了准确的发现,需要有系统的方法来解决报告不一致的问题.
- 没有解释不一致报告的研究应谨慎解释.
相关概念视频
Surveys
16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
43.4K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.4K
Reliability and Validity
13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K
Cross-Sectional Research
12.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.3K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
550
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
550


