Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

373
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
373
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions01:10

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

370
When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...
370
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Ultralow-complexity fiber nonlinearity compensation based on gradient-driven pruned Kolmogorov-Arnold network.

Optics letters·2025
Same author

Protocol for Micro Computed Tomography Quantification of Neo-osteogenesis in High Density Additively Manufactured Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds.

ACS applied bio materials·2025
Same author

Effect of Entrapped and Free Calcium Hydroxyapatite Particles on Rheological Properties of Hyaluronic Acid-Calcium Hydroxyapatite Composite Hydrogels.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Mechanobiologically-optimized non-resorbable artificial bone for patient-matched scaffold-guided bone regeneration.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Up to 182 GBd PAM-4 optical interconnects eliminating receiver-side equalization DSP.

Optics letters·2025
Same author

Evaluation of osseointegration of plasma treated polyaryletherketone maxillofacial implants.

Scientific reports·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments
06:40

Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments

Published on: January 28, 2021

4.7K

优化的LiDAR目标用于基准测试深度测量准确度.

Jiachen Dong, Chuanchuan Yang, Hai Xin

    Optics express
    |December 19, 2025
    PubMed
    概括

    研究人员开发了一种优化的光检测和射程 (LiDAR) 目标,以改善自动驾驶汽车的深度测量准确性验证. 这一新目标增强了信号质量区分,大大提高了基准测试的可靠性.

    科学领域:

    • 机器人技术和自主系统
    • 传感器技术 传感器技术
    • 计量学 计量学 计量学

    背景情况:

    • 自动驾驶汽车在3D感知和深度测量方面严重依赖光检测和测距 (LiDAR).
    • 验证LiDAR深度准确性对于安全的自动驾驶至关重要,但基准目标优化仍未得到充分探索.
    • 现有的方法缺乏足够的解释性和优化,无法进行强大的LiDAR性能评估.

    研究的目的:

    • 提出和验证一个优化的LiDAR目标,以提高深度测量准确度的验证.
    • 为了提高在测试中的LiDAR返回信号质量的区分能力.
    • 为评估LiDAR性能差异提供一种可量化的方法.

    主要方法:

    • 使用LiDAR模拟器来模拟与信号质量相关的扫描错误.
    • 开发了一个"差异函数"来量化深度测量误差的差异.
    • 根据模拟结果,使用3D打印设计和制造一个优化的目标形状.

    主要成果:

    • 优化的目标显著增加了两个LiDAR传感器之间的深度测量误差差 (与平面目标相比,超过七倍).
    • 拟议的目标有效地防止混错误来源掩盖性能差异.
    • 通过信号质量指标来区分LiDAR性能的可靠性有所提高.

    更多相关视频

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
    08:08

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

    Published on: March 6, 2019

    5.6K
    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
    07:58

    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

    Published on: July 25, 2025

    723

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

    Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments
    06:40

    Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments

    Published on: January 28, 2021

    4.7K
    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
    08:08

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

    Published on: March 6, 2019

    5.6K
    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
    07:58

    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

    Published on: July 25, 2025

    723

    结论:

    • 优化的LiDAR目标为验证自动驾驶汽车传感器深度测量精度提供了更有效和可靠的方法.
    • "差异函数"为量化LiDAR性能和指导目标优化提供了一个有价值的工具.
    • 这项研究有助于开发更强大的自动驾驶系统的基准测试.