Jove
Visualize
联系我们

相关概念视频

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

365
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
365
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

185
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
185
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

296
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
296
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Augmenting large language models with psychologically grounded models of causal reasoning for planning under uncertainty.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Do We Appeal to the Knowledge of Our Political Rivals?

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

Effects of scarcity on women's cognitive ability to manage mental health and substance use after prison release.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Communities of Knowledge in Trouble.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Walking the party line: The growing role of political ideology in shaping health behavior in the United States.

SSM - population health·2021
Same author

Managing evidence in food safety and nutrition.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2020
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Children's narrow learning bottleneck accelerates the emergence of statistical properties of language.

Cognition·2026
查看所有相关文章
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K

在政治化的问题解决中,零和偏见是政治化的问题解决.

Almos C Molnar1, Steven Sloman1

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States of America.

Cognition
|December 21, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

政治框架引发零和偏见,影响问题解决. 当问题与他们的政治观点相一致时,党派提出更不有效的解决方案,表明政治化如何限制思维.

关键词:
政治的心理学政治心理学.政治化的政治化.解决问题的方法 解决问题的方法推理 推理 推理 推理一个零和偏见.

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

科学领域:

  • 社会心理学 社会心理学
  • 政治心理学 政治心理学
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 零和偏见是认为一方的收益需要另一方的损失,即使存在双赢的结果.
  • 之前的研究在各个领域发现了零和偏差,但触发因素仍未得到充分探索.
  • 政治是一个零和信念普遍存在的领域,这表明政治框架可能会影响这种偏见.

研究的目的:

  • 调查政治化问题是否会在党派中起到零和信念的触发或抑制作用.
  • 检查政治框架是否导致不同政治团体提出的质量不同的解决方案.
  • 了解政治框架影响问题解决能力的机制.

主要方法:

  • 进行了五项实验研究,涉及不同政治派别 (民主党人和共和党人) 的参与者.
  • 问题以政治 (例如,企业减税,移民政策) 和非政治术语来阐述.
  • 参与者提出了解决方案,并评估了它们的有效性,努力,思维约束和零和信念.

主要成果:

  • 政治框架显著影响了解决问题的有效性,民主党人和共和党人提出了更有效的解决方案,这些解决方案符合他们的政治倾向.
  • 只有在政治化的框架下,政治团体之间解决问题的表现才会出现差异.
  • 政治框架通过限制考虑的解决方案的范围来干扰问题解决过程,而不是通过改变努力或社会可接受性来干扰问题解决过程.

结论:

  • 政治化问题可以引发或抑制零和偏见,导致解决问题的有效性存在党派差异.
  • 政治框架对解决问题的影响是通过对认知灵活性的约束而不是努力的变化来调解的.
  • 关于特定政治框架的零和信念的存在,而不是情感反应,预测了解决问题的结果.