Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Global and regional DNA methylation patterns in heart failure: a case-control analysis.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

p1/s1, a 3'-nucleotidase/nuclease, allows Leishmania major to circumvent host innate immune response mechanisms.

PLoS pathogens·2026
Same author

Proteomic profiles in inclusion body myositis and polymyositis with mitochondrial pathology.

Acta neuropathologica communications·2026
Same author

Metabolic Profiling of the EmDia Cohort by LC-MS Reveals Empagliflozin-Intake Associated Regulation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol and Urate.

Proteomics·2025
Same author

Employing RNA editing to engineer personalized tumor-specific neoantigens (editopes).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Proteome dynamics of chilli pepper fruits during development and ripening from two Mexican cultivars of Capsicum annuum L.

Journal of proteomics·2025
Same journal

A temporal phospho-acetylome atlas of human myogenesis identifies coordinated post-translational regulation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Temporal proteomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infected mouse lungs.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Platelet proteome links metabolism to reactivity in Essential Thrombocythemia.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Genetic rescue of disrupted synaptic protein interaction network dynamics following SYNGAP1 reactivation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

ASAP-ID: Proximity labelling with small tags.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Proteome profiling reveals NQO2 activity contributing to proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma cell lines.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

759

对DDA-PASEF免疫类药物的基准测试软件

Yannic Chen1, Annica Preikschat2, Annette Arnold3

  • 1Helmholtz Institute for Translational Oncology Mainz (HI-TRON Mainz) - A Helmholtz Institute of the DKFZ, Mainz, Germany; DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP
|December 21, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究对免疫学软件进行了基准测试,发现PEAKS和FragPipe识别了最多的免疫. 数据库大小会影响性能,强调在质谱分析中需要仔细的软件选择.

更多相关视频

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

515
Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
12:11

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

759
Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

515
Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
12:11

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.2K

科学领域:

  • 免疫类药物 免疫类药物
  • 质谱法 (MS) 是一种质谱法.
  • 蛋白质组学是指蛋白质组学.

背景情况:

  • 质谱测量对于高通量免疫的识别至关重要.
  • 免疫的识别需要复杂的算法,因为缺乏蛋白质分解特异性.
  • 缺乏对免疫类药物数据处理软件的系统评估.

研究的目的:

  • 为了对广泛使用的基于数据依赖获取 (DDA) 的软件进行综合性比较.
  • 为了比较MaxQuant,FragPipe,PEAKS和MHCquant的性能,识别信心和潜在偏差.
  • 评估数据库大小对免疫的识别效率的影响.

主要方法:

  • 使用JY细胞系的Thunder-DDA-PASEF数据对MaxQuant,FragPipe,PEAKS和MHCquant进行基准测试.
  • 评估免疫的识别能力和信心水平.
  • 对潜在偏差的分析以及数据库大小对识别的影响.

主要成果:

  • 所有评估的软件平台都成功识别了突出的免疫,具有1%的FDR控制和中高可靠性.
  • 皮克斯 (PEAKS) 确定了免疫的数量最多,紧随其后的是FragPipe,这是一个强大的非商业选择.
  • 较大的数据库大小对不同软件平台的性能产生了不同的负面影响.

结论:

  • 这项研究提供了关于当前MS数据处理工具的优点和局限性的宝贵见解,用于免疫学.
  • 推PEAKS和FragPipe用于免疫的识别,而FragPipe作为一个可行的替代方案.
  • 这些发现有助于免疫学界选择适合用于质谱数据分析的软件.