同行导航员对老年人干预坚持和保留的影响:随机试验中的一项研究 - - SWAT
Shannon K Runge1, Elizabeth M Hudak2, Jade A Sutfin2
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC 560, 1720 2(nd) Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Contemporary clinical trials
|December 26, 2025
概括
同行导航器在一项针对健康老年人的临床试验中显著改善了干预坚持和研究保留. 这种个性化的支持增强了参与者参与研究的参与度.
科学领域:
- 老年学是一门学科.
- 临床试验 临床试验
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
背景情况:
- 参与者的参与对于临床试验的成功和治疗疗效至关重要.
- 虽然导航者有利于慢性疾病患者,但它们对健康人口和试验参与的影响未得到充分研究.
- 同行导航者,前研究参与者,提供了一个独特的支持模式.
研究的目的:
- 调查同行导航者是否能提高健康老年人的干预坚持.
- 为了确定同行导航者是否能提高临床试验中健康老年人研究保留率.
主要方法:
- 一项随机临床试验中的一个子研究涉及将同行导航员分配给社区居住的老年人的子集 (N=268).
- 六名前试验参与者为36名参与者担任同行导航员.
- 统计分析检查了导航员分配与干预坚持或研究保留之间的关联.
主要成果:
- 导航员的分配与显著更好的干预坚持相关 (p < .001),参与者平均完成了5次以上的会议.
- 在被分配给导航员的参与者中,研究保留率显著更高 (100%与76%相比,p = .002).
- 带导航员的参与者在年龄和人口统计学方面与一般试验样本相似.
结论:
- 同行导航者在涉及老年人的临床试验中显示出改善干预坚持和保留治疗的潜力.
- 个性化的同行支持可能是提高参与者参与临床研究的关键因素.
- 需要进一步的研究来复制这些发现,并探索同行导航的更广泛适用性.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Community Based Intervention
256
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
256
Longitudinal Research
13.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.0K


