在线极端主义:互联网激进主义,激进化和反策略的研究趋势
Charlie Winter1, Peter Neumann1, Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens2
1International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR) at King's College London.
概括
暴力极端分子利用互联网进行宣传,招募和物流. 本综述探讨了在线激进化,个人社会化以及对抗网络恐怖主义的新兴对策.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算机科学 计算机科学
- 安全研究 安全研究
背景情况:
- 互联网已经成为暴力极端主义活动的关键领域.
- 了解在线极端主义景观的演变是必不可少的.
研究的目的:
- 审查有关暴力极端分子使用互联网的学术文献.
- 分析网络激进化和极端主义行动的目的和方法.
- 探索应对网络暴力极端主义的新兴策略.
主要方法:
- 学术文献的系统审查.
- 关键概念的分析:极端主义,网络恐怖主义,在线激进化.
- 追踪极端主义在线平台的演变.
主要成果:
- 暴力极端组织使用互联网进行宣传,招募,物流,资金和黑客攻击.
- 个人使用在线平台进行社交和学习,促进激进化.
- 虚拟的极端主义格局已经从静态网站演变为社交媒体和加密应用程序.
结论:
- 互联网为个人和组织暴力极端主义提供了多方面的作用.
- 打击在线暴力极端主义需要采取防御和进攻措施的结合.
- 需要进一步研究当前在线反极端主义策略的有效性.
更多相关视频
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.5K
09:40Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
Published on: November 15, 2014
14.5K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
38.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.3K
Bullying
8.8K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.8K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.6K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.6K
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals
2.4K
Radicals adjacent to electron‐withdrawing groups are called electrophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with nucleophilic alkenes. For example, the malonate radical, in which the radical center is flanked by two electron‐withdrawing groups, reacts readily with butyl vinyl ether, which consists of an electron‐donating oxygen substituent. The reaction between electrophilic malonate radical and nucleophilic vinyl ether is favored because the radical has a...
2.4K
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
2.4K
The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic...
Along with electronic...
2.4K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
2.6K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.6K
