临床评估和对前带冠和常规复合修复之间的家长满意度的比较:一个随机对照试验
A U Hosna1, J Nessa, D Bhattacharya
1Dr Asma-Ul-Hosna, Assistant Professor of Children & Preventive Dentistry, Mymensingh Medical College (MMC), Bangladesh;
Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ
|December 31, 2025
概括
前带冠显示出更好的表面光滑性和更高的家长满意度比主要牙复合修复. 虽然大多数差异在统计学上并不显著,但条纹皇冠是恢复腐烂的前乳腺牙的有利选择.
科学领域:
- 儿科牙科 儿科牙科
- 恢复性牙科 恢复性牙科
- 牙科材料科学 牙科材料科学
背景情况:
- 初级切口牙的牙由于美学和耐用性要求,会带来修复挑战.
- 通常使用常规的复合修复和前带冠,但相对比较的临床数据有限.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较前列带冠的临床疗效和家长的满意度,与前列牙的常规复合修复相比,前列牙的临床疗效和家长的满意度.
主要方法:
- 进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及28名儿童的60个主要上切口器.
- 临床表现 (保留,边缘适应,表面质地) 和家长满意度在9个月内使用USPHS标准和利克特尺度进行了评估.
- 用奇方位和独立t测试 (p<0.05显著性) 分析了数据.
主要成果:
- 在9个月的大部分临床标准中,在条纹冠和复合修复之间没有观察到统计学上显著的差异.
- 3个月和9个月后,条纹冠 (80.0%) 与复合材料 (50.0%) 相比,表面光滑性明显更好 (p<0.05).
- 前面的条纹皇冠在美学方面产生了更高的家长满意度.
结论:
- 与传统的复合材料修复相比,前面的条纹皇冠显示出更高的表面光滑性和更高的家长满意度.
- 条纹皇冠似乎是一个更有利的修复选项,对于各种主要大前牙,尽管在大多数参数有限的统计学上显著的差异.
更多相关视频
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
1.0K
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
683
相关概念视频
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K
Crossover Experiments
3.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.4K
