相关实验视频
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
三种健康相关社会需求查工具的性能比较
Kayla M Fennelly1, Alessandra Calvo-Friedman2, Jenifer Clapp2
1From the Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (KMF, RM, LM, NJD, CAB); Office of Ambulatory Care + Population Health, NYC Health + Hospitals, New York, NY (ACF, JC, JH, NJD); Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (ACF). kayla.fennelly@nyulangone.org.
纽约市卫生和医院 (NYC H+H) 的社会需求选器在确定患者需求时与其他常见选器相似. 患者偏好偏好纽约H+H工具,虽然不是显著的.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 临床实践 临床实践
背景情况:
- 社会需求查对于解决健康差异至关重要.
- 现有的选器在性能和患者接受度上有所不同.
- 纽约市卫生和医院 (NYC H+H) 开发了一种新的社会需求选器.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较纽约H+H社会需求选器与两个已建立的选器的性能和患者偏好.
- 评估不同社会需求查工具在确定患者需求方面的有效性.
- 为了评估患者对纽约市H+H社会需求选器的满意度.
主要方法:
- 在纽约两个H+H初级保健诊所进行了一项比较研究.
- 一个方便的患者样本完成了纽约市的H+H选器,并与负责任的健康社区或WellRx选器一起完成.
- 分析的重点是检测到的需求率,确定需求的数量和患者的偏好.
主要成果:
- 纽约H+H选器在识别具有社会需求的患者方面表现与替代选器相似 (κ = 0.7 和 κ = 0.6).
- 每个查人员发现的积极社会需求的数量是可比的.
- 患者表示更喜欢纽约H+H选器,尽管这种差异在统计学上并不显著.
结论:
- 所有三个评估的社会需求选器都在识别患者需求方面表现相似.
- 尽管问题措辞和答案选项有所不同,但选人员取得了相似的结果.
- 纽约市H+H社会需求选器是确定健康的社会决定因素的可行选择.
相关概念视频
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities

