在加密球菌脑膜炎试验中对等级复合终点的结果排名 (DOOR) 和获胜率的可取性评估
Biyue Dai1, Nicole Engen1, Caleb P Skipper2
1Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
概括
层次复合终点通过包括死亡率和不良事件来提高抗真菌试验的相关性. 这些方法增强了对加密球菌脑膜炎治疗的临床试验分析.
科学领域:
- 临床试验 临床试验
- 传染性疾病 传染性疾病
- 生物统计学 生物统计学
背景情况:
- 传统的抗真菌试验通常使用全因死亡率作为主要终点.
- 这种方法可能无法完全捕捉关键的治疗结果,如不良事件或耐受性.
研究的目的:
- 在加密球菌脑膜炎临床试验中评估分层复合终点的实用性.
- 将患者的死亡率和安全优先考虑在试验结果评估中.
主要方法:
- 一项涉及34名专家的Delphi调查确定了复合材料终端构建的关键优先事项.
- 分析了三项随机临床试验 (AMBITION-cm,ENACT,ASTRO-CM) 使用获胜率和结果排名的可取性 (DOOR).
- 计算更好的DOOR概率 (BDP),以量化研究治疗更理想的结果的可能性.
主要成果:
- 德尔菲调查显示,对死亡率和严重不良事件的优先考虑很强.
- 在AMBITION-cm中,单剂量脂质体安波特里辛B显示出优越性 (BDP55%,胜率1.23).
- 在ENACT中的口服安福特里辛B和ASTRO-CM中的辅助塞特拉林在使用这些复合终点时没有显示出统计学上显著的益处.
结论:
- 阶层复合终点是可行的,并提高了加密球菌脑膜炎试验的临床相关性,特别是在非劣势性研究中.
- DOOR和Win Ratio提供互补的统计见解,DOOR提供绝对等级,Win Ratio估计相对治疗效应.
- 这些先进的终点更好地反映了治疗的疗效,安全性和耐受性,而不是传统的仅死亡率的措施.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
397
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
397
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
548
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
548
Hazard Ratio
558
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
558
Kaplan-Meier Approach
556
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
556
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K


