相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

在创伤性脑损伤的住院康复期间命名障碍和语言障碍:对评估和干预的影响

Kimberly L Frey¹, Natalie Gilmore², David B Arciniegas³

¹Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO.

American journal of speech-language pathology

|January 7, 2026

概括

近70%的创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者经历了急性创伤后语言障碍 (aPTLD),特别是命名障碍. 这种命名困难与较长的神经康复停留相关,并在出院后持续存在.

科学领域:

神经科学是一个神经科学.
康复医学康复医学康复医学
语音语言病理学语音语言病理学

背景情况:

创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 可以导致认知障碍,包括语言障碍.
创伤后急性语言障碍 (aPTLD) 是TBI的一个公认的后果.
了解aPTLD的发生率和影响对于有效的神经康复至关重要.

研究的目的:

确定在住院神经康复期间TBI成年人的aPTLD的发生率和类型.
检查aPTLD与神经康复停留时间 (LOS) 之间的关联.
为了记录aPTLD的恢复率,从录取到释放.

主要方法:

从2016年至2018年接受神经康复的成年TBI患者的回顾性分析.
使用了波士顿命名测试第二版 (BNT-2) 和西部失言症电池修订 (WAB-R) 的子测试.
包括Rancho Los Amigos认知功能的水平V或更高的患者.

主要成果:

大约70%的Rancho Los Amigos V+级患者表现出BNT-2评分受损.
损坏的BNT-2分数与较长的总和康复LOS有显著的关联.
大多数通过WAB-R识别的失语病例是流利的失语病例.
超过一半的患者从入院到出院时仍然对BNT-2有损.

结论:

命名障碍 (aPTLD) 在TBI后的住院神经康复阶段普遍存在.
aPTLD可以混依赖于口头输出的认知评估.
在神经康复期间使用BNT-2和WAB-R是可行的,并且有助于评估TBI患者的认知交流状态.

更多相关视频

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia

Published on: July 2, 2013

相关概念视频

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.