Jove
Visualize
联系我们

相关概念视频

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

879
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
879
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Processes of Self-Presentation01:29

Processes of Self-Presentation

204
Effective self-presentation is a central component of social interaction and identity construction. It relies on the dynamic processes of defining the situation and engaging in self-disclosure. These mechanisms help individuals navigate social context expectations and manage how others perceive them, fostering mutual understanding and relationship development.Defining the SituationSocial situations are shaped by collectively understood frames—a set of widely understood rules or...
204
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.3K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Shared decision-making in scaling and root planing.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2023
Same author

Toward an operational definition of shared decision making: A conceptual analysis.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2022
查看所有相关文章
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K

共享决策还是共享信息?

David W Chambers1

  • 1University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, USA.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
|January 9, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

共享决策,患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的协作方法,导致更稳定,更令人满意的治疗选择. 与个人决策相比,这种方法也会导致较少的伦理质疑结果.

关键词:
谈判 谈判 谈判 谈判优化的优化优化优化.患者的满意度 患者的满意度排名顺序选择的选择.共享决策的共同决策.

更多相关视频

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

804
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

804
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

科学领域:

  • 决策科学 决策科学
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 医学伦理 医学伦理

背景情况:

  • 患者和医疗保健专业人员的决定甚至与相同的信息相冲突.
  • 个人决策模式并不总是符合患者和提供者的观点.

研究的目的:

  • 引入两人共同决策,作为个人方法的替代方案.
  • 使用决策理论定义和运行共享决策 (SDM).

主要方法:

  • 制定了共同决策的操作定义.
  • 利用双人决策理论来建模决策过程.
  • 使用计算机模拟来分析决策满意度模式.

主要成果:

  • 共享决策 (SDM) 产生了更稳定,更令人满意的治疗决策.
  • SDM的结果与较少的道德上可疑的结果有关.
  • 模拟显示了SDM在共同信息条件下的优势.

结论:

  • 结合共享信息的共享决策优于独立的患者或专业选择.
  • SDM提高了治疗决策的质量和伦理地位.
  • 这个框架为协作医疗保健选择提供了一个强大的模型.