成年人耳植入的结果:对使用定性方法学的研究进行范围审查
Pia Bergman1,2,3, Björn Lyxell4,5, Elina Mäki-Torkko2,6
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jönköping County hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
International journal of audiology
|January 12, 2026
概括
定性研究表明,耳植入显著影响深度听力损失的成年人,提供改变生活的好处和超越听力学措施的挑战. 这些发现为患者提供了关于耳植入物结果的关键观点.
科学领域:
- 听力学和耳鼻喉学
- 定性研究方法 定性研究方法
- 患者报告的结果
背景情况:
- 深度双边听力损伤显著影响成年人的生活质量.
- 耳植入器 (CI) 是严重到严重的听力损失的治疗选择.
- 了解患者对CI的体验对于全面的结果评估至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 综合成年耳植入结果的定性研究的方法和发现.
- 从患者的角度确定与耳植入相关的各种好处和挑战.
- 突出CI结果的各个方面,通常被定量研究遗漏.
主要方法:
- 使用了一个范围审查方法.
- 包括使用定性或混合方法研究设计的研究.
- 从23篇经过同行评审的文章中提取了数据,这些文章通过全面的数据库搜索来确定.
主要成果:
- 有根据的理论和主题分析是常见的定性方法.
- 采访和开放式调查是主要的数据收集工具.
- 确定了10个结果领域,包括改善沟通,改变生活的经历,身份转变,社会和就业影响,音乐感知,耳管理和负面经历.
结论:
- 定性研究为耳植入器的多方面的影响提供了深入的见解.
- 患者的观点揭示了与CI相关的广泛益处和挑战.
- 这些发现强调了在评估耳植入成功时考虑主观经验的重要性.
相关概念视频
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:23Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...