Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.4K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.4K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.4K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.2K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

15.0K
Presented here is a protocol to improve stereoacuity using gamified perceptual learning software based on random-dot stimuli. Patients are stereo-deficient subjects without strabismus. The protocol combines optometry center visits with home exercises using software. Compliance and stereoacuity evolution are stored in the...
15.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Safety-Driven Response Adaptive Randomization: An Application in Noninferiority Oncology Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Sotatercept reduces bone morphogenetic protein signaling in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

A stochastic programming approach for dynamic allocation of bed capacity and assignment of patients to collaborating hospitals during pandemic outbreaks.

Health care management science·2026
Same author

Covariate Adjustment in Basket Trials Borrowing Information Across Subgroups.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Clinical Trial Simulation: Planning With the OCTAVE Framework, Implementation and Validation Principles.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Drug Development for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Unleashing the Potential of Single-Patient Studies Using Continuous Monitoring.

Pulmonary circulation·2025
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K

一个燃烧问题:在贝叶斯响应适应性随机化之前,初始等随机化阶段应该有多长时间?

Edwin Yn Tang1, Stef Baas2, Daniel Kaddaj3

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Statistical methods in medical research
|January 19, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

响应适应随机化 (RAR) 试验从燃烧期中受益,但其最佳长度尚不清楚. 本研究引入了一种精确的评估方法,表明燃烧长度显著影响试验功率和准确性,需要仔细选择以获得最佳结果.

关键词:
有条件的精确测试试验.二元结果的二元结果.确切的运行特性.两只手臂的试验试验.无条件的精确测试试验.

更多相关视频

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K
Random Error
01:04

Random Error

8.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K
Random Error
01:04

Random Error

8.8K

科学领域:

  • 临床试验方法论 临床试验方法论
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 贝叶斯统计学贝叶斯统计学

背景情况:

  • 响应适应性随机化 (RAR) 在临床试验中增强了参与者的益处,但使统计分析复杂化.
  • 一个非适应性"内燃"周期通常用于减轻这些复杂性,但最优持续时间指导缺乏.

研究的目的:

  • 引入一个精确的评估方法来评估燃烧长度对双臂二进制贝叶斯RAR (BRAR) 设计中的统计操作特征的影响.
  • 为BRAR试验提供选择最佳燃烧期的指导.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一种精确的评估方法来分析不同燃烧长度的BRAR设计的统计操作特征.
  • 研究了燃烧持续时间对I型错误率,功率和估计偏差的影响.
  • 利用精确测试对总成功进行了条件化,并将其与校准和异常测试进行了比较.

主要成果:

  • 常见的校准和非对称测试显示,在没有燃烧期的BRAR设计中,I型错误率膨胀.
  • 增加内燃长度可以减少但不能消除I型错误膨胀,突出需要精确的测试.
  • 准确的测试条件在总的成功证明了优越的平均和最低功率在各种内燃长度.
  • 燃烧长度显著影响功率和参与者的好处,最佳通常发生在中间长度.
  • 试验统计影响I型错误率和功率;估计偏差因治疗效果大小和试验大小而异.

结论:

  • 选择内燃长度对于BRAR试验的统计有效性和效率至关重要.
  • 准确的评估方法对于准确评估BRAR设计至关重要,特别是关于I型错误率.
  • 最佳的燃烧时间不一定是最短或最长的,强调需要量身定制的设计考虑.