医学学生对小组教学与以讲座为基础的教学在资源有限的环境中的看法:印度的一项试点研究
Sudha Rani1, Govind Kumar Gupta2, Santosh Kumar1
1Department of Anatomy, Sheikh Bhikhari Medical College, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India.
Annals of African medicine
|January 22, 2026
概括
印度医学学生认为小组教学 (SGT) 比基于讲座的PowerPoint教学 (LBTP) 更有效. SGT增强了理解,参与和知识保留,支持其融入医学教育.
科学领域:
- 医疗教育 医学教育
- 高等教育中的教育学.
背景情况:
- 医学教育正在转向交互式方法,如小组教学 (SGT).
- 传统的基于讲座的PowerPoint教学 (LBTP) 的有效性越来越多地在学生参与和批判性思维方面受到争议.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较印度医学本科生对SGT和LBTP的看法.
- 评估学生对交互式与传统教学方法的偏好.
主要方法:
- 一项试点研究涉及100名印度医学本科生.
- 同一个主题使用SGT (小组) 和LBTP (全班讲座) 进行教学.
- 通过问卷收集学生的反,并使用描述性统计和千平方测试进行分析.
主要成果:
- 85%的学生认为SGT比LBTP更有效,理由是更好的理解和参与.
- 与LBTP (11.2%) 相比,SGT (62.2%) 的知识保留率明显高.
- 主要的SGT优势包括改善互动,清晰度,同行学习和个性化反.
结论:
- 在印度的医学学生中,小组教学被认为优于基于讲座的PowerPoint教学.
- 研究结果支持在资源有限的医学教育环境中采用以学习者为中心的交互式方法.
相关概念视频
Case Studies
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...


