Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

10.8K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
10.8K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

327
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
327
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a tool for infectious keratitis.

Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and subtype differentiation of infectious keratitis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

Corneal biomechanical and tomographic outcomes following accelerated cross-linking in keratoconus: a focus on cone localization.

Japanese journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Severe Eyelid Coloboma and Related Ocular Surface Disorders in Amniotic Band Syndrome.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2025
Same author

Denoising diffusion-based anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) image generation.

International ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Ocular surface and corneal subbasal nerve plexus changes in ocular graft versus host disease patients treated with topical cyclosporine.

BMC ophthalmology·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.4K

开发和临床验证DMEK风险和结果预测 (DROP) 评分:一个动态的时间机器学习框架.

Feyza Dicle Işık1, Emine Esra Karaca1, Kasim Oztoprak2

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.

Journal of clinical medicine
|January 28, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

新的DMEK风险和结果预测 (DROP) 评分为Descemet膜内皮质角膜整形手术 (DMEK) 提供了个性化的风险评估. 糖尿病和高血压是影响患者结果的关键因素.

关键词:
DROP分数的得分是什么德塞米特膜内皮质角膜整形术 (DMEK)基准测试 (benchmarking) 是一种比较的方法.角膜内皮质的角膜内皮质机器学习是机器学习.风险分层的风险分层.时间动态的时间动态.

更多相关视频

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

509

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.4K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

509

科学领域:

  • 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
  • 角膜外科手术 角膜外科手术
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学

背景情况:

  • 德塞梅特膜内皮质角膜整形术 (DMEK) 需要准确的风险分层,以获得最佳的患者结果.
  • 现有的模型可能无法完全整合各种预测因素.
  • 需要一个全面的基准模型来进行个性化的DMEK风险评估.

研究的目的:

  • 开发和验证DMEK风险和结果预测 (DROP) 评分.
  • 将患者,捐赠者,手术和中心特定的参数整合到一个预测模型中.
  • 为DMEK后的个性化风险评估提供一个工具.

主要方法:

  • DROP评分是使用四个子评分来开发的:患者风险概况 (PRP),捐赠组织质量 (DTQ),手术复杂性指数 (SCI) 和中心性能因子 (CPF).
  • 权重是从文献中获得的,并通过灵敏度分析进行验证.
  • 临床验证涉及76个DMEK眼睛和89个对照,使用机器学习 (EfficientNetV2B3,随机森林) 和IVCM成像.

主要成果:

  • 平均DROP得分为39.35±7.61,其中92.1%为中度和7.9%为高风险病例.
  • 高风险患者的12个月最佳校正视敏度 (BCVA) (0.50对0.31 logMAR) 显著降低.
  • 糖尿病 (OR: 4.34) 和高血压 (OR: 2.65) 被确定为主要的预后因素.

结论:

  • DROP评分为DMEK提供了透明的,个性化的风险评估.
  • 糖尿病和高血压是影响DMEK结果的关键系统因素.
  • 需要进一步收集前性数据来完全验证DROP评分的四个领域.