近红外光对手术伤口愈合的影响:系统性审查和元分析
Junyan Liu1, Varun Gopal2, Brian Ellis2
1Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
International wound journal
|January 28, 2026
概括
近红外线 (NIR) 疗法在改善术后伤口愈合和减少疼痛方面表现有前途. 最佳的结果与特定的波长,会话数量和应用方法有关,尽管证据确定性很低.
科学领域:
- 生物医学工程 生物医学工程
- 照相医疗 (photomedicine) 是一种医学.
- 再生医学是一种再生医学.
背景情况:
- 近红外线 (NIR) 疗法用于增强术后伤口愈合.
- 关于NIR治疗治疗伤口愈合的临床试验结果是不一致的.
- 需要高质量的证据综合来澄清NIR治疗的疗效和最佳参数.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和元分析NIR治疗对术后伤口愈合的有效性.
- 为了确定与最佳结果相关的特定治疗参数 (波长,流动性,会话,应用).
- 评估NIR治疗对疼痛,胀,痕和炎症标志物的影响.
主要方法:
- 随机对照试验的系统审查和元分析,比较NIR疗法 (630-1100nm) 与标准护理或安慰剂.
- 标准化平均差异 (SMD) 的多层随机效应元分析.
- 考克伦RoB 2.0用于偏差风险评估和GRADE用于证据确定性.
主要成果:
- 尼尔射线治疗显著改善了伤口愈合 (SMD=0.78) 和减少了术后疼痛 (SMD=0.71).
- 观察到很高的异质性,在不同研究中效果有所不同.
- 最佳结果与较短的NIR波长 (700-850nm),4-10次会议和非接触应用有关.
- 在胀,痕和炎症标志物方面注意到不一致的效应.
- 证据的整体确定性被评为非常低.
结论:
- 尼尔射线疗法显示了增强术后伤口愈合和缓解疼痛的潜力.
- 治疗方案的变化显著影响治疗结果.
- 需要进一步进行高质量的研究,以确定NIR疗法在伤口管理中的最终有效性和最佳应用指南.
相关概念视频
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.2K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
6.0K
Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.0K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K


