Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Comments on Xu et al. (2026) "Development of a microscopy-based diagnostic test for alkali injury-induced limbal stem cell deficiency through autofluorescence multispectral imaging" (Exp. Eye Res. 264:110829).

Experimental eye research·2026
Same author

Interpretable integration of SEM and SVM for reliable thyroid nodule classification.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same author

Reconsidering regression-based predictors in adults with attention‑deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Beyond Parametric Assumptions: Reevaluation of Environmental Interactions in Prenatal Exposure Studies.

Chest·2026
Same author

Correspondence on "Clinical correlation between metabolic biomarkers and chemoresistance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia" by Kong et al.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2026
Same author

Evaluating Linear Parametric Poisson Regression vs Nonparametric Unsupervised Learning in Ulcerative Colitis Data.

Gastroenterology·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

可靠性差距:为什么高预测准确度不能保证稳定的特征重要性?

Yoshiyasu Takefuji1

  • 1Faculty of Data Science, Musashino University, 3-3-3 Ariake Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8181, Japan.

Marine pollution bulletin
|February 8, 2026
PubMed
概括

对于环境数据的机器学习可以产生不稳定的特征重要性. 无监督的方法提供了对污染物和贝类中毒风险的稳定,可靠的见解,验证了环境ML实践.

科学领域:

  • 环境科学 环境科学
  • 数据科学数据科学数据科学
  • 海洋生物学 海洋生物学

背景情况:

  • 机器学习 (ML) 和可解释AI (XAI) 越来越多地用于环境风险评估,例如污染物分析和贝类中毒.
  • 像主要组件分析 (PCA) 和夏普利添加式扩展 (SHAP) 这样的技术是常见的,但线性PCA可能会在非线性环境数据中失败,并且特征重要性通常被视为没有验证的基本真理.

研究的目的:

  • 在环境研究中,从监督的ML模型中获得的特征重要性的可靠性进行批判性评估.
  • 引入和验证评估ML衍生特征排名稳定性和一致性的方法.
  • 为了比较监督与无监督ML方法的性能和稳定性,用于环境风险预测.

主要方法:

  • 利用巴斯克沿海数据集 (8195例,14个特征) 与叶绿素-a作为性贝类中毒风险的代理.
  • 实施了一个leave-top1-out交叉验证程序,以评估功能排名的稳定性.
  • 将监督模型 (随机森林,XGBoost与/或没有SHAP) 与无监督和非目标预测方法进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 监督模型 (随机森林,XGBoost) 在特征重要性排名中表现出显著的不稳定性,这表明模型依赖偏差.
  • 无监督和非目标预测方法显示出完美的排名稳定性.
关键词:
预测环境风险 预测环境风险特性重要性 稳定性 稳定性解释SHAP的解释监督学习限制 监督学习限制没有监督的特征选择选择.

更多相关视频

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Troubleshooting and Quality Assurance in Hyperpolarized Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Tools for High-Quality Image Acquisition
09:55

Troubleshooting and Quality Assurance in Hyperpolarized Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Tools for High-Quality Image Acquisition

Published on: January 5, 2024

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Troubleshooting and Quality Assurance in Hyperpolarized Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Tools for High-Quality Image Acquisition
09:55

Troubleshooting and Quality Assurance in Hyperpolarized Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Tools for High-Quality Image Acquisition

Published on: January 5, 2024

  • 这些稳定方法与监督模型的预测性能相匹配或超过.
  • 结论:

    • 由于潜在的不稳定性和偏见,在环境科学中监督的ML模型中的特征重要性应谨慎解释.
    • 非监督和非目标预测方法为环境风险评估提供了更强大,更稳定的洞察力.
    • 稳定性,一致性,剂量反应关系和线性等常规检查对于可靠的环境ML研究至关重要.