相关实验视频
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

07:37
An Adoptive Transfer Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Mice
Published on: June 6, 2025
1.2K
自体抗体作为风湿性关节炎进展的预测因素:系统性审查和元分析
Sumera Qureshi1, Maryam Adas2, Phoebe J Cope3
1Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK sumera.qureshi@kcl.ac.uk.
RMD open
|February 11, 2026
概括
自体抗体显著增加类风湿性关节炎 (RA) 的风险. 患有CCP2和IgM-RF以及关节痛的个体在24个月内表现出最快的RA进展.
科学领域:
- 类风湿病学 类风湿病学
- 免疫学 免疫学 免疫学
- 流行病学 流行病学
背景情况:
- 自体抗体是自身免疫性疾病的关键指标.
- 了解自身抗体概况有助于预测类风湿性关节炎 (RA) 的发展.
- 以前的研究已经探索了各种自身抗体作为RA预测器.
研究的目的:
- 评估自身抗体阳性与自身抗体阴性个体中RA的相对风险.
- 为了确定不同人群中随着时间的推移,RA的累积发病率.
- 为了确定与加速RA进展相关的特定自身抗体组合和临床因素.
主要方法:
- 在2025年8月进行的系统文献搜索.
- 26项符合条件的研究的元分析,包括追溯病例控制和前性观察设计.
- 用于估计RA进展的累积发病率的聚合生存模型.
主要成果:
- 血清自身抗体使得患上RA的风险增加了3.1至19.3倍.
- 在12个月后,RA的最高累积发病率在CPC2-阳性,关节痛和IgM-RF.患者中为35.2%.
- 在患有关节痛的人群中,RA进展的风险在前24个月内最高.
结论:
- 特定自身抗体的组合,如CCP2和IgM-RF,以及关节痛等临床症状,是快速发育RA的强有力的预测因素.
- 风湿性关节炎的发病时间至关重要,在症状患者的早期随访中观察到高风险.
- 这项研究强调了对自身抗体阳性个体,特别是关节痛患者的监测的重要性,以及时诊断和干预RA.
相关概念视频
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.6K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.6K
Random and Systematic Errors
15.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.3K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
6.0K
Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.0K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K

