有效地使用PRO来预测生存率:在NSCLC患者中基于变压器的建模
D Dudas1, T J Dilling2, H Jim3
1LMU Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Machine Learning, Tampa, FL, USA.
概括
使用患者报告结果 (PROs) 的变压器模型改善了SBRT治疗的早期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者的生存预测准确度. 食欲丧失和疼痛是生存的最重要的预测因素.
科学领域:
- 在瘤学瘤学.
- 数据科学数据科学数据科学
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
背景情况:
- 准确的生存预测对于以患者为中心的护理,治疗规划和瘤学中的息护理转诊至关重要.
- 目前的临床生存估计可能过于乐观,可能会降低患者的生活质量 (QoL).
- 患者报告的结果 (PROs) 是有价值的预测指标,可以提高预后准确性.
研究的目的:
- 探索变压器架构,利用纵向PRO轨迹来提高早期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者的生存预测准确度.
- 通过使用变压器模型,识别使用变压器模型对生存预测最具有预后相关的PRO症状.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个基于变压器的模型来分析475名接受SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC患者的纵向PRO数据 (埃德蒙顿症状评估量表 - ESAS).
- 该模型结合了PRO,临床和人口统计变量来预测整体生存期 (OS),将性能与Cox比例危险回归和联合概率模型进行比较.
- 以c指数和AUC为指导的SHapley添加剂扩张 (SHAP) 值和逆向淘汰被用于模型解释和症状识别.
主要成果:
- 变压器模型在发现组中实现了0.753的交叉验证c指数和0.862的AUC,在持有测试组中实现了0.694的c指数和0.785的AUC.
- 变压器模型显著优于传统的Cox和联合概率生存模型.
- SHAP分析发现食欲丧失,疼痛,整体幸福感和呼吸短促是预测生存的最重要的预后症状.
结论:
- 整合纵向PRO的基于变压器的生存模型显著提高了SBRT治疗NSCLC患者的预后准确性.
- 失去食欲和疼痛被确定为生存的最强有力的预测因素,其次是整体幸福感和呼吸短促.
- 针对性,以症状为重点的PRO跟踪可以提高生存估计,并简化在常规瘤治疗中的临床实施.
相关概念视频
Bacterial Transformation
60.2K
In 1928, bacteriologist Frederick Griffith worked on a vaccine for pneumonia, which is caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. Griffith studied two pneumonia strains in mice: one pathogenic and one non-pathogenic. Only the pathogenic strain killed host mice.
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...
60.2K
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
242
Age-related pharmacokinetic changes are extensively documented, but understanding age-related pharmacodynamic alterations is relatively limited. This knowledge gap can be partly attributed to the complexity of developing appropriate measures of drug responses compared to bioanalytical methods for determining drug concentrations.Most information regarding age-related differences in human pharmacodynamics originates from cross-sectional studies. However, these studies assume that observed mean...
242
Predicting Molecular Geometry
46.2K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.2K
Survival Curves
749
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
749
Survival Tree
437
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
437
Prediction Intervals
3.4K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
3.4K


