家庭语言活动和语言能力在中国学龄前儿童与耳道植入物和正常听力儿童之间
1Doctoral Program in Disability Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.
Audiology research
|February 20, 2026
概括
对于带有耳植入器 (CI) 的中国学龄前儿童来说,日常沟通活动显著提高了语言技能,而不是识字. 干预措施应侧重于丰富的对话,以改善CI用户的语言发展.
科学领域:
- 儿科听力学 儿科听力学
- 发展心理学是发展心理学.
- 语音语言病理学 语言病理学
背景情况:
- 耳植入物 (CI) 提供听觉接入,但CI儿童的语言发展是复杂的.
- 家庭语言环境显著影响幼儿时期的语言学习.
- 对于有效的干预来说,了解支持儿童语言的特定家庭活动至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查家庭语言活动对中国学龄前儿童的语言能力的影响,与正常听力 (NH) 同龄人相比.
- 确定哪些类型的母语活动最能预测每个群体的语言结果.
- 为患有脑损伤的儿童提供基于证据的家庭康复策略.
主要方法:
- 对比研究设计,涉及中国学龄前儿童与CI和NH同龄人.
- 相关性和回归分析,以检查家庭语言活动与语言能力之间的关系.
- 对人口变量进行控制,以隔离语言活动的影响.
主要成果:
- 在患有智商障碍的儿童中,日常沟通活动 (例如对话) 比家庭识字活动更能预测语言结果.
- 对于NH儿童来说,家庭识字活动 (例如,共享阅读) 与语言发展有着更明显的独立关联.
- 在CI和NH组之间,关于家庭语言环境影响的明显预测模式出现了.
结论:
- 对有智商障碍的学龄前儿童进行家庭干预应优先考虑互动的日常沟通,而不是结构化的识字活动.
- 对于正常听力儿童的干预模型可能无法直接适用于患有CI的儿童.
- 专注于对话互动的定制策略对于优化年轻CI用户的语言发展至关重要.
更多相关视频
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
29.8K
04:32Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
930
相关概念视频
Language Development
977
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
977
Language and Cognition
848
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
848
