Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.1K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.9K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.1K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

2.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.3K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.5K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.5K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.3K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) in society. Healthcare providers and researchers' views on the public health and socio-cultural implications of PRS in healthcare contexts.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Beyond Good Intentions: A Justice-Based Critique of Short-Term Medical Missions.

Journal of religion and health·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in healthcare contexts: what's the scope? An interview study of European healthcare providers and researchers' perspectives on ethical challenges.

Human genetics·2025
Same author

Conscientious objection in euthanasia and assisted suicide: A systematic review.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2024
Same author

Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.

European journal of pediatrics·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

生物伦理学是一个学科吗? 超越了方法论上的缩小主义.

Carlos Gomez-Virseda1, Lara Andreoli2, Roshni Jegan2

  • 1Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. carlos.gomezvirseda@kuleuven.be.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy
|February 20, 2026
PubMed
概括

生物伦理学是一个独特的学术学科,不仅仅是一个跨学科领域. 它的独特特点,包括多元主义和规范性重点,肯定了它在解决复杂的医疗保健和医疗问题的地位.

关键词:
生物伦理学生物伦理学概念分析 概念分析这是纪律性.方法论 方法论 方法论规范伦理学是一种规范的伦理学.

更多相关视频

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K

科学领域:

  • 生物伦理学生物伦理学
  • 科学哲学的科学哲学
  • 医学人文学科 医学人文学科

背景情况:

  • 生物伦理学作为一个独特的学科的定义和地位自成立以来就一直在争论.
  • 关于定义学科和生物伦理学预期贡献的标准存在持续的紧张关系.
  • 这篇文章通过概念分析来讨论生物伦理学学科性的辩论.

研究的目的:

  • 批判性地评估关于生物伦理学学科地位的现有论点.
  • 提出在生物伦理学背景下对学科性的更广泛,更有活力的理解.
  • 证明生物伦理符合学科的核心元素.

主要方法:

  • 通过概念分析,重新探讨了关于生物伦理学学科性的辩论.
  • 一个批判性的接触与伯恩·霍夫曼的狭窄,以方法为中心的学科性观点.
  • 通过克里什南的综合框架来评估生物伦理与六个核心元素的学科性.

主要成果:

  • 霍夫曼的纪律性标准被发现过于严格,与当前的学术实践不一致.
  • 生物伦理学展示了特定的研究对象,专业知识,结构理论,共同的术语,特定的方法和机构表现.
  • 该领域的多元化和规范性取向是对其复杂主题的适当回应.

结论:

  • 生物伦理符合学科的六个核心元素,肯定了它的地位.
  • 该领域的特点,通常被视为弱点,实际上是与其主题相一致的优势.
  • 生物伦理学是一个合法和独立的学科,将哲学反思与医学和医疗保健的实际参与联系起来.