超越分类协议:在CLSI占主导地位的印度接受强有力的AST能力测试的基本协议
Balaji Veeraraghavan1, Chand Wattal2, Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam1
1Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Indian journal of medical microbiology
|February 21, 2026
概括
现在ISO 20776-2标准将基本协议 (EA) 和偏差优先考虑类别协议 (CA) 对于抗菌感应性测试 (AST) 设备验证. 这影响了外部质量评估 (EQA) 和抗菌管理 (AMS) 框架.
科学领域:
- 临床微生物学 临床微生物学
- 医疗器械验证 医疗器械验证
- 抗微生物耐药性 抗微生物耐药性
背景情况:
- 在ISO 20776-2:2021标准中,对抗微生物敏感性测试 (AST) 器件验证的分类协议 (CA) 没有重视,而倾向于基本协议 (EA) 和偏见.
- CA依赖不断变化的临床断点使外部质量评估 (EQA) 的纵向可比性变得复杂.
研究的目的:
- 讨论更新的ISO标准对EQA程序的影响.
- 建议EA/bias作为AST设备验证的主要指标.
- 为了比较关于抗微生物管理 (AMS) 的EUCAST和CLSI CA框架.
主要方法:
- 对EUCAST和CLSI CA框架进行比较分析.
- 评估断点变化对EQA评分的影响.
- 讨论印度技能计划中EQA的混合方法.
主要成果:
- 转向EA/bias解决了CA的局限性,原因是断点的变化.
- 欧卡斯特的"I"类别减少了模糊性,但可能会增加差异;CLSI的"I"适应错误,但可能会超标.
- 建议在印度的基于CLSI的计划中采用混合EQA方法.
结论:
- 外部质量评估 (EQA) 必须适应新的ISO标准,优先考虑EA/bias.
- 在EUCAST和CLSI之间协调CA框架对于有效的抗菌药物管理 (AMS) 至关重要.
- 针对依赖CLSI指南的地区 (如印度) 推量身定制的混合EQA战略.
相关概念视频
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
13.5K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
13.5K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
1.1K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.1K
Goodness-of-Fit Test
9.3K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
9.3K
Reliability and Validity
14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Soundness of Cement
608
The soundness of cement refers to the ability of cement paste to retain its volume after setting. Unsound cement can lead to expansion and structural damage due to the presence of free lime, magnesia, and calcium sulfate. Free lime hydrates very slowly, expanding and causing unsoundness, which is difficult to detect because it intercrystallizes with other compounds. Magnesia also reacts with water, forming crystals that can disrupt the cement's structure. Calcium sulfate can create...
608
Significance Testing: Overview
12.8K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
12.8K

