Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

552
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
552
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

459
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
459

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Multimodal LLM vs. Human-Measured Features for AI Predictions of Autism in Home Videos.

Algorithms·2026
Same author

Ensemble Modeling of Multiple Physical Indicators to Dynamically Phenotype Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Algorithms·2026
Same author

Remote Assessment of Parkinson Disease Using Deep Learning on Structured Mouse-Trace Data From Suspected Cases: Machine-Learning Pilot Feasibility Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

The effect of distributional information on the categorization of unaccusativity.

Journal of child language·2026
Same author

Higher Medical Urgency Is Associated With Greater Psychosocial Risk Tolerance in Liver Transplant Listing and Selection.

Transplantation·2026
Same author

Access to care affects electronic health record reliability and AI-driven disease prediction.

Nature health·2026
Same journal

Sensitivity Analyses of a Scoring System for a Contraception Decision Aid.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Improving electronic health record processing of large language models via retrieval-augmented generation: A case study on dietary supplements.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Developing a User-Centered Mobile Application Prototype: Bridging Lower-Limb Fracture Care from Skilled Nursing Facility and Back to the Community.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

KERAP: A Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning Approach for Accurate Zero-shot Diagnosis Prediction Using Multi-agent LLMs.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Automating Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Using Large Language Models.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Predictive Factors and State-Level Barriers to Postpartum Birth Control Usage in the United States: Insights from PRAMS Phase 8.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

在临床人工智能中的多对抗性偏见.

Md Rahat Shahriar Zawad1, Irene Y Chen2,3, Peter Washington3

  • 1University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一个多对手的调试框架,通过同时优化多个公平度指标来提高临床机器学习中的公平性. 新方法有效地减少了人口统计学平价和不平等的虐待,同时保持了模型的性能.

相关实验视频

科学领域:

  • 机器学习 机器学习
  • 临床信息学 临床信息学
  • 算法公平性 算法公平性

背景情况:

  • 临床机器学习模型可能会表现出偏见,影响公平的医疗保健结果.
  • 当前的偏差分析方法往往专注于优化单一的公平度量,可能会忽视其他偏差类型.

研究的目的:

  • 引入和评估用于临床机器学习的新型多对手式调解框架.
  • 共同优化多个公平性定义,特别是人口平等 (DP) 和不平等的虐待 (DM).

主要方法:

  • 开发了一个扩展对抗性脱的多对抗性脱框架.
  • 雇佣了代表DP和DM的两个对手进行联合优化.
  • 评估了两个临床数据集 (UCI心脏病,帕金森病) 和两个基准数据集 (COMPAS,成人收入) 的框架.

主要成果:

  • 多对手方法在数据集中成功地将DP降低了0.03-0.22和DM降低了0.02-0.12.
  • F1得分保持在基线模型的0-16%之间,表明性能妥协最小.
  • 在数据集中,在所有受保护属性中具有平衡表示的数据集中,有效性最高.

结论:

  • 多对抗性调试提供了一个比单一指标优化更全面的方法来缓解临床ML中的偏差.
  • 该框架显示了在医疗保健人工智能应用中提高公平性的潜力.
  • 数据集的特征,特别是保护属性的标签表示,影响对抗性 debiasing 的有效性.