调解团队发展和有效性之路:团队知识管理在军事化警察中的作用
Ana Pinto1, Soraia Oliveira2,3, Paulo Renato Lourenço4
1Centre of Business and Economics Research (CeBER), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
概括
知识管理提高了军事化警察中的团队效率. 它通过结构化知识共享来提高适应能力和绩效,特别是在后期的群体发展阶段.
科学领域:
- 组织心理学 组织心理学
- 公共管理 公共管理
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
背景情况:
- 有效的知识管理对于团队在军事化环境中的适应能力至关重要.
- 军事化的警察团队面临着独特的操作挑战,需要高性能.
- 了解团队发展对团队有效性的影响至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 研究团队知识管理流程的调解作用.
- 检查团队发展与团队效率之间的关系.
- 分析军事化警察单位内部的这些动态.
主要方法:
- 在211个军事化警察队的2400名参与者中进行了调查.
- 使用结构方程建模和因子分析进行数据分析.
- 探索小组发展阶段和知识管理.
主要成果:
- 知识管理部分调解了集团发展与有效性之间的联系.
- 早期阶段:知识管理减轻了对有效性的负面影响.
- 后期阶段:知识管理通过直接和中介效应对有效性产生了积极影响.
结论:
- 结构化的知识共享和成熟的团队流程提高了军事化警察的有效性.
- 需要有针对性的战略来整合角色并改善信息共享.
- 促进适应能力是优化高风险环境中性能的关键.
更多相关视频
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.6K
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
7.2K
相关概念视频
Impact of Individuals on a Group
384
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
384
Impact of Groups on Groups
293
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
293
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
3.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
3.1K
Self-Help Support Groups
417
Self-help support groups are voluntary, community-based organizations that provide a platform for individuals with shared concerns to exchange support, insights, and practical strategies for coping with life challenges. Typically led by group members or paraprofessionals, these groups form a cornerstone of mental health care, especially in reaching populations that are underserved by traditional healthcare systems.
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
417
Groupthink
50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K
Group Polarization
39.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.3K
