Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

11.3K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.3K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.9K
Data Collection by Observations01:08

Data Collection by Observations

15.4K
Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
15.4K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

13.5K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Preconditions Contributing to Interprofessional Collaboration in the Management of COPD in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

International journal of integrated care·2025
Same author

Childhood drowning in South Africa: local data should inform prevention strategies.

Pediatric surgery international·2014
Same author

[Aphthae].

Praxis·2010
Same author

The prevalence of allergic sensitisation in immigrant children in The Netherlands.

International archives of allergy and immunology·2004
Same author

Acute effect of air pollution on respiratory complaints, exhaled NO and biomarkers in nasal lavages of allergic children during the pollen season.

International archives of allergy and immunology·2003
Same author

Exhaled NO level and number of eosinophils in nasal lavage as markers of pollen-induced upper and lower airway inflammation in children sensitive to grass pollen.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2003

相关实验视频

Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.9K

一般实践中的环境书记:一个多视角的前后纵向混合方法研究.

R C A van Linschoten1, C M van Loon2, L Joanknecht3

  • 1Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.vanlinschoten@erasmusmc.nl.

NPJ digital medicine
|March 2, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

环境书记显著减少了全科医生 (GPs) 的临床文档时间,减轻了工作量. 然而,潜在的缺点,如不准确的摘要,需要进一步研究,以确保护理质量.

更多相关视频

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status
06:58

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

3.4K
Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

3.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.9K
An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status
06:58

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

3.4K
Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

3.0K

科学领域:

  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 主要护理医学 医疗保健
  • 人与计算机的交互

背景情况:

  • 一般医生的高工作量会对临床医生的幸福感和患者护理质量产生负面影响.
  • 环境写字器是新兴技术,可以减轻文档负担,但证据有限,特别是关于患者的观点.
  • 现有的研究往往忽视了环境书记对临床体验的多方面的影响.

研究的目的:

  • 评估环境书记在减少全科医生的临床文档时间方面的有效性.
  • 评估环境书记对总咨询时间,文档质量以及患者和GP经验的影响.
  • 探索环境书记在现实世界初级保健环境中的可接受性和使用模式.

主要方法:

  • 进行了一项前性,多中心,多视角,前后纵向混合方法研究.
  • 12名全科医生和接受培训的全科医生没有先前的环境写字体验参与了.
  • 收集的数据包括535次咨询的临床文档时间,咨询时间,文档质量,患者/医生经验,可接受性和使用量,比起基线和干预期.

主要成果:

  • 每次咨询的临床文档时间减少了42.7秒 (p < 0.0001).
  • 总咨询时间保持不变.
  • 定性调查结果表明,医生工作量减少,一些患者的沟通改善,同时还对摘要准确性和敏感数据处理存在担忧.

结论:

  • 环境写作在减少文档负担和支持初级保健中的沟通方面表现有前途.
  • 需要进行进一步的研究,以解决意想不到的后果,例如摘要的不准确性和对敏感信息讨论和临床推理的潜在影响.
  • 缓解这些缺点对于优化环境写字技术实施时的护理质量和可访问性至关重要.