为什么学校烟草禁令失败:比利时学校的员工参与执法
Pierre Laloux1, Arja Rimpelä2,3, Vincent Lorant1
1Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, Brussels 1200, Belgium.
Health promotion international
|March 3, 2026
概括
学校工作人员愿意执行烟草政策,但执法取决于共同的承诺和感知到的职业责任. 有效的烟草控制需要员工,领导和家长的整合,才能成功实施政策.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 教育政策的教育政策.
- 行为科学 行为科学
背景情况:
- 学校的烟草政策 (STP) 对烟草控制至关重要,但往往缺乏有效的执法.
- 工作人员对执行STP的犹,破坏了它们的有效性.
- 学校是烟草禁令实施的被忽视的前线.
研究的目的:
- 测量和解释员工参与执行STP的情况,使用新开发的规模.
- 确定影响STP执法的关键态度维度.
- 评估预测员工参与烟草控制的因素.
主要方法:
- 开发和验证一个10项级别,以评估员工是否愿意执行STP.
- 探索性因子分析 (EFA) 以确定态度维度.
- 多层次分析以确定执法行为的预测因素.
- 对比利时18所中学624名教职员工进行的研究 (ADHAirE研究).
主要成果:
- 工作人员报告说,他们很愿意执行STP (平均值=2.89/4).
- 两个关键的态度层面出现了:将执法视为专业角色 (得到广泛认可) 和规则的共享性 (较少遵守).
- 通过感知同事执法和规则理由来预测执法;感知父母支持和学校优先级较低.
结论:
- 当STP执法被视为专业角色时,当规则在学校社区中共享时,STP执法就会得到加强.
- 有效的执法需要学校工作人员,领导层和家长的共同承诺.
- 经过验证的尺度可以评估学校吸烟禁令的一致性和支持.
相关概念视频
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
619
Drug control governance involves the oversight and regulation of pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy while preventing illegal drug use and trafficking. Regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMA), play a central role in this process. These agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs before they can be marketed. They fund clinical trials and assess the benefits and risks associated with...
619
Stimulants
1.1K
Stimulants are substances that enhance neural activity and elevate dopamine levels in the brain, leading to their highly addictive nature. These drugs include cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, caffeine, and nicotine, each with distinct mechanisms of action and varied health implications.
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
1.1K
Obedience
35.7K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.7K


