"我们跟随虚假信息":概念化和分析跨国事实检查文化.
Daniela Mahl1, Jing Zeng1, Mike S Schäfer1
1Department of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
概括
事实验证文化在跨越国家边界,甚至在巴西和德国之间,都显示出令人惊的相似之处. 这项研究表明,尽管存在差异,但事实核查实践具有共同点,超越了组织和地理上的分歧.
科学领域:
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 错误信息通过影响投票行为和侵蚀信任来挑战民主社会.
- 在全球范围内,为打击错误信息,事实核查倡议已经发展起来.
- 现有的事实核查研究有限,专注于全球北方,缺乏比较研究.
研究的目的:
- 引入一个情境敏感的框架来分析事实检查文化.
- 对巴西 (全球南方) 和德国 (全球北方) 的事实核查进行跨国比较分析.
- 探索事实检查文化中的分歧和融合.
主要方法:
- 混合方法设计集成计算,定性和定量内容分析.
- 分析了11个事实检查组织和13498篇事实检查文章 (2013-2023年).
- 质量半结构面试与10名事实检查员进行.
主要成果:
- 在事实检查文化中确定了分歧和趋同的领域.
- 在跨国设计中证明了情境敏感框架的适用性.
- 研究结果表明,事实检查文化不受组织或国家界限的约束.
结论:
- 事实检查文化表现出超越国家和组织背景的共同点.
- 这项研究为对全球事实核查进行比较分析提供了一个新的框架.
- 进一步的研究可以建立在这些发现的基础上,以了解各种事实核查景观.
相关概念视频
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
41.7K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
41.7K
Social Proof
24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Stereotype Content Model
13.1K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.1K
Deindividuation
22.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
22.4K
Understanding Deception
258
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
258
Correspondence Bias
390
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
390


